-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Barbato wrote:
| Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
| going to do?"
|
| Please project leaders try to reply in short.
To complete the reports for the Lisp project, I will now report for the Common
Lisp and
Sche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
A brief summary about the Gentoo GUIs project:
1 - Markus (jokey) recently released a new version of Maintainer-Helper.
It already has the basic operations running and some people are working
in a Gtk+ port.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jo
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 22:31 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Are we fine?
Speaking for the ruby herd (which isn't a project and doesn't have a
lead, but I'm sure Richard or Josh will correct any mistakes I make):
No. Even though there are plenty of people in the herd only a few of us
commit on a regu
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 11-01-2008 21:52:08 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > - sort out the 64-bits targets with their multilib-hell forced upon us
> >
> > dont know exactly what you're referring to, but multili
On 11-01-2008 21:52:08 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > - sort out the 64-bits targets with their multilib-hell forced upon us
>
> dont know exactly what you're referring to, but multilib is completely
> optional.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> - sort out the 64-bits targets with their multilib-hell forced upon us
dont know exactly what you're referring to, but multilib is completely
optional.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, 09. January 2008 20:40:48 Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > KDE 4.0.0 will be released on January, 11th 2008, and if things keep
> > going like they do now we might be able to put all the stuff into
> > ~arch on the release day.
We're not going to make it today. (Which is quite obvious since
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:35 +0530, Anant Narayanan wrote:
>
> If nobody has a problem with making the GWN a GMN (Monthly
> newsletter), then I am willing to volunteer to get this project back
> on track. Even if few people actually submit anything, I think there
> is enough activity going on
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:35 +0530, Anant Narayanan wrote:
> If nobody has a problem with making the GWN a GMN (Monthly
> newsletter), then I am willing to volunteer to get this project back
> on track. Even if few people actually submit anything, I think there
> is enough activity going on th
On 20:53 Thu 10 Jan , Marius Mauch wrote:
> - release test versions of portage-2.2, see how all the new stuff works
> in practice and adjust things if necessary
Could you start kicking out masked/unkeyworded snapshots? Release early,
release often, and all that jazz.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gento
About portage:
Current status:
The portage project is mostly fine, though we've missed my original
plan to release the first 2.2 test versions last year, mostly because
of lack of time on my part. I hope we can fix that within the next two
or three months.
As Paul has already mentioned, the tools-
n 1/7/08, Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
>
> Please project leaders try to reply in short.
>
> About the stuff I'm involved:
>
> Are we fine?
>
GLEPS -
Thanks to nesyx I rewrote the glep index to use n
Good day All,
Sorry for the thread hijack, but...
GWN: The GWN is currently in a permanent state of hiatus. I have no
intentions on spending another minute working on the GWN. While many,
many improvements have been made in the processes for getting the
automated data, getting articles has be
For sparc:
1. Are we fine?
Qualified yes. We are understaffed and at some point burn out is going
to catch up with us. At the moment we seem to be keeping up, largely
because of the superhuman efforts of Raúl Porcel (armin76). Also
because of his and agaffney's efforts, we are on track for rel
Programming Languages and (sub) Ada
Monday, 7. January 2008, Luca Barbato Ви написали:
> Are we fine?
PL:
Ok as it is but could be better. It was concieved, among other things, to
consolidate resources and, possibly, do discussions of common things for some
of the languages we have support for (
Gnome Herd (although my commit rate is kinda low these days)
Luca Barbato a écrit :
Are we fine?
Mostly, Gnome packages these days tend to be more stable, pushing the
complexity (and breakages) lower down into the stack (HAL, PolicyKit)
The rest of team is steadily adding Gnome 2.20.3 packa
Hi *:
Speaking for Gentoo/Alpha Arch Team (ferdy is the lead but I used to be
the status report guy):
Luca Barbato escribió:
Are we fine?
I would say: yes.
Reasons:
- General keywording is just fine.
- Security bugs are done in a reasonable period of time.
- We have a new and shiny de
Scientific Gentoo
Monday, 7. January 2008, Luca Barbato Ви написали:
> Are we fine?
>
More or less, I'd say Ok with the stuff we have in the tree already. Need more
devs (who does not? :)) that's for sure. Right now we are ~10 people for 300
packages and there are another ~300+ in bugzilla. Whic
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
Documentation
(Note: I'm not the project lead, but neysx isn't on the list, nor does
he send status updates, so I hope he and the rest of the project won't mind.
> Are we fine?
Sure, why n
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 22:31 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
>
> Please project leaders try to reply in short.
tools-portage:
Are we fine? The short answer is no. We need more developers.
Unfortunately, real life
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Barbato a écrit :
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
>
> Please project leaders try to reply in short.
>
Ok, technically I'm not security lead, but since I and rbu almost
completely handled th
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>> What are we going to do:
>
> GWN: no clue, looks like nothing
Well I hope there is somebody willing to at least try to get a minimal
gwn as new year kickoff out even just by summarizing this thread ^^;
> RelEng: work on catalyst/genkernel, no further plans
I'm lookin
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Well having it open source doesn't mean automatically ppc support but
> there are people working on it.
I'm quite aware about it I followed the improvement on this side since a
while even if I hadn't the time to try myself building it on ppc yet.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo
Luca Barbato kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:
- Get the remaining Generation 1 stuff out of the tree (not much left)
- Start using virtuals more
- Eclass cleanup and new make our setup even more automatic
any plan/idea about icedtea? as a ppc user I'd love too see it in
portage ^^;
lu
Well h
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 22:31 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
>
> Please project leaders try to reply in short.
>
> About the stuff I'm involved:
>
> Are we fine?
GWN: The GWN is currently in a permanent state of hi
> KDE 4.0.0 will be released on January, 11th 2008, and if things keep
> going like they do now we might be able to put all the stuff into
> ~arch on the release day.
> I'm going to mail about this again in -core soon.
Unless you mean hard masked, I do object. The code base has too many issues
an
Petteri Räty wrote:
>
> - Get the remaining Generation 1 stuff out of the tree (not much left)
> - Start using virtuals more
> - Eclass cleanup and new make our setup even more automatic
any plan/idea about icedtea? as a ppc user I'd love too see it in
portage ^^;
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo Co
- KDE 3 & KDE 4
- KDE-related stuff
Are we fine?
All in all, we're doing acceptably well, I'd say. In some areas, we're
doing really well.
I've recently mentored two new recruits, namely Ingmar "Ingmar"
Vanhassel and Bo "zlin" Andresen who will hopefully soon become new
members of the
For the ppc64 project
Are we fine?
- The induction of the PS3 has helped us a lot. We have more users than
before. Great variance skill-wise amongst those users but interest
level is high. We need more folks on the dev team but otherwise we're
as healthy as we've ever been.
- Just put a
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:31:54 +0100
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
>
> Please project leaders try to reply in short.
xfce (has no lead, it's angelos, welp or me) - we are good, few ~minor
bugs, everyth
On Jan 9, 2008 1:12 PM, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recruiters
>
> >
> > About the stuff I'm involved:
> >
> > Are we fine?
>
> If Calchan agrees, we are fine.
I'm taking care of recruits as fast as I can. I figure any time I
spend for the recruiters project is worth a lot more than
Luca Barbato kirjoitti:
Please project leaders try to reply in short.
Recruiters
About the stuff I'm involved:
Are we fine?
If Calchan agrees, we are fine.
What are we going to do:
Keep going as usual.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Luca Barbato kirjoitti:
Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
going to do?"
Java
Please project leaders try to reply in short.
Are we fine?
Quite okay. Slowly recruiting new people and doing the usual
maintenance. Could always use more active people of cour
Luca Barbato wrote:
Please project leaders try to reply in short.
The following is for the Gentoo WM project.
Are we fine?
We should be. The next answer should indicate where we can use some
improvement. As for the GNUstep packages, I'm not too sure what the
status is, but bugzilla doesn't r
On 07-01-2008 22:31:54 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
GNUstep
> Are we fine?
I'd say thanks to voyageur (much kudos to the guy) GNUstep is back where
it should be within Gentoo and up-to-date. Eclass changes, pac
On 07-01-2008 22:31:54 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
> going to do?"
>
> Please project leaders try to reply in short.
Gentoo/Alt:Prefix
> Are we fine?
Sure.
- reached >10% coverage/replication of the gentoo-x86 tree
- convince
Here is a list of interesting questions: "Are we fine?" "What are we
going to do?"
Please project leaders try to reply in short.
About the stuff I'm involved:
Are we fine?
media
- gfx : nothing much under the sun, bumping stuff here and there.
- video: getting ready for the new ffmpeg and th
37 matches
Mail list logo
