Gentoo Security Project Summary -- was Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-25 Thread Robert Buchholz
Gentoo Security Project Summary Short Summary: The Security Team is up and running, but we are dealing with numerous tasks and a high load in daily maintenance. Fresh blood is not only appreciated, but needed to continue the luxury of Security Support we currently have. We have too many open bugs,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries- kernel

2009-05-12 Thread Daniel Drake
Christian Faulhammer wrote: Hi, any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status report: kernel: Continues to be a small team with desires to grow. Our processes scale well but recruitment does not. Only real task is to handle gentoo-sources, 90% of the time is handling

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 18:45 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote: > > Medium term : > - libxcb 1.2 will be moved to portage once we figure out a sane way > to > handle the disappearance of libxcb-x11.so. For those who haven't > heard > or seen what happens during the upgrade, let's just say that the > up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 10.05.2009 23:08: > > > Eselect project: > > I've joined the project one month ago. Looks like it's my duty to > write a status report. ;-) > Thank you for bringing the eselect project back to life. -- Daniel Pielmeier signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 10/05/2009 23:43, Gokdeniz Karadag a écrit : It seems like you have forgotten the link. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267769 Thanks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries - KDE team sumary

2009-05-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On Monday 11 May 2009 00:44:11 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 10-05-2009 a las 20:54 +0300, Markos Chandras escribió: > > We did quite good job in pushing Qt-4.5 packages really quick. We have a > > stabilization process for 4.5.1 packages[1] as well. We maintain many > > qt4 > > I cannot see "[1]"

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries - KDE team sumary

2009-05-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 10-05-2009 a las 20:54 +0300, Markos Chandras escribió: > We did quite good job in pushing Qt-4.5 packages really quick. We have a > stabilization process for 4.5.1 packages[1] as well. We maintain many qt4 I cannot see "[1]" link, seems missing in original mail I think that it's: http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status > report: Emacs project: Christian has already reported, and I think he has covered the major points. So nothing to add from my side. Eselect project: I've joined the p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 09:49:53 Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status > report: > [..] Maybe, it would be nice each project, that wants more manpower, to update this[1] page, so that users would know what projects need more con

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:49 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status > report: The Ruby project summary: We've had two new project members recently: a3li and gengor. In addition we also have a number of new people who help out on oc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries - SPARC team summary

2009-05-10 Thread Ferris McCormick
We are an architecture team, so except for one developer (bluebird) who is actively working on true multilib support (64-bit userland), we are mostly reactive to bug reports for security, testing, and keywording. Currently we have enough developers to pretty much keep up with demand. However, not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:49 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status > report: > XEmacs: > graaff is the lone wolf here and because upstream development of XEmacs > is not really on fire, he has not too much to do, I think. He > int

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries - KDE team sumary

2009-05-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On Sunday 10 May 2009 19:18:04 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status > > > report: > > Hi. > > Gentoo KDE team status report. > >[..] > -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 06/05/2009 08:49, Christian Faulhammer a écrit : Hi, any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status report: X11 Herd Status Update Short term or recently done : - 1.5.3-r5 went stable (I'm sure y'all noticed) - there will be another 1.5 stable server within a few we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries - KDE team sumary

2009-05-10 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status > > report: > > Hi. Gentoo KDE team status report. Current: - We have a Lead again (me). It happened on FOSDEM, so it might have been

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries - Java & Recruiters

2009-05-09 Thread Petteri Räty
Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status > report: > Java: - Too much stuff in overlays - Beat caster with a stick - Need more people to maintain our hundreds of packages - Critical pkgs do have designated maintainers - Beat all m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries - Alpha Arch Team

2009-05-06 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Robert Buchholz wrote: > Note that we have a Summer of Code student this year who is working on a > project to gather both hardware and software statistics from Gentoo > users. If you have any special requirements for your platform, I am > sure he has open ears. No need to invent two wheels at t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries - Alpha Arch Team

2009-05-06 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > I've been toying with the idea of offering something akin to > Debians popularity contest tool. Some people are rather > uncomfortable with data gathering tools that send stuff to some > strangers, so I don't know how well it would work. I list th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-06 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
> Future projects: > revdep-rebuild support for mono! > AOT support > Getting Mono tests to not fail in Sandbox. > Reducing the bus-factor. I have too much of this stuff in my head. I > should write docs... Later. Add to your todo: Making mono working on KDE4. It has bindings, but i dont have guts

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-06 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Wed, 6 May 2009 08:49:53 +0200 Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status > report: Gentoo .NET progress Currently doing good. Nothing much to report. Everything is shiny and well-oiled. SVN ebuilds of trunk and branches were r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries - Alpha Arch Team

2009-05-06 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! So where are we at with alpha currently? Xorg-1.5 As some of you know, xorg-1.5 abandoned the "classic" way of interfacing with PCI and AGP cards in favor of using libpciaccess. That, in turn expects support from the kernel in the form of /sys/devicesresourceN files. Unfortuna

[gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-05 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status report: Gentoo Lisp in general: We are working on all our problems, but some sub-projects are a bit understaffed (e.g. Common Lisp, because pchrist is away for a year), while Scheme is in good shape but has only one active d