Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members

2010-04-11 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 11/04/2010 15:16, Markos Chandras a écrit : > How about the participation to the discussions which took place every > day on our mailing lists or in IRC? I, for one, am actually glad that the council (as such) isn't involved in every troll fest we have on -dev, and I hope we keep it that way.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members

2010-04-11 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11-04-2010 13:16, Markos Chandras wrote: > Hello folks, > > Looking through the Council project page, the policy regarding the inactive > council members doesn't look optimal to me As others have already explained, this is from GLEP39 and it has

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members

2010-04-11 Thread Matti Bickel
Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote: > But isn't it the councils purpose to lead gentoo? It's my understanding that council gets elected to lead gentoo as a whole. But in the end the one doing the work gets to decide what's going on (as long as it's intra-project; the only thing i remember where council g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members

2010-04-11 Thread Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 04:04:57PM +0200, Matti Bickel wrote: > /me puts on his asbestos underwear > > Markos Chandras wrote: > > So the attendance to council meetings is enough to prove that a member is > > active? 0_o > > Yes. Anything else is just too hard to measure, imo. If you notice a >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members

2010-04-11 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2010.04.11 14:16, Markos Chandras wrote: > Hello folks, > > Looking through the Council project page, the policy regarding the > inactive > council members doesn't look optimal to me > > "To ensure that the council stays active, the chosen metastructure > model says > that if a council membe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members

2010-04-11 Thread Matti Bickel
/me puts on his asbestos underwear Markos Chandras wrote: > So the attendance to council meetings is enough to prove that a member is > active? 0_o Yes. Anything else is just too hard to measure, imo. If you notice a council member acting w/o knowing what the heck is going on, then vote him dow

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members

2010-04-11 Thread Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:16 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote: > So the attendance to council meetings is enough to prove that a member > is active? 0_o Yes, since council meetings are where the crucial voting happens. Council members that fail to show up to meetings are not generating the output we ha

[gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members

2010-04-11 Thread Markos Chandras
Hello folks, Looking through the Council project page, the policy regarding the inactive council members doesn't look optimal to me "To ensure that the council stays active, the chosen metastructure model says that if a council member (or their appointed proxy) fails to show up for two consecu