Re: [gentoo-dev] Policies (was: [RFC] QA Team's role)

2006-02-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 11:39, Jakub Moc wrote: > 28.2.2006, 17:24:21, Danny van Dyk wrote: > > If you don't agree with the contents, why didn't you raise your > > opposition earlier? > > I don't feel any need to raise opposition against some unofficial manual, > what would be the point in that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policies (was: [RFC] QA Team's role)

2006-02-28 Thread Jakub Moc
28.2.2006, 17:24:21, Danny van Dyk wrote: > Hi Jakub, > If you don't agree with the contents, why didn't you raise your > opposition earlier? I don't feel any need to raise opposition against some unofficial manual, what would be the point in that? I'm raising my hand against silently incorpora

[gentoo-dev] Policies (was: [RFC] QA Team's role)

2006-02-28 Thread Danny van Dyk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jakub, Jakub Moc schrieb: | 28.2.2006, 16:29:07, Stephen Bennett wrote: |>>When and where has been the following change discussed and who |>>approved that? |>> |>>http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/proj/en/devrel/handbook/hb-guid