On Thursday, December 01, 2016 10:13:17 PM Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:50:42PM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote:
[snip]
> > Thanks for bringing this to attention. It's somewhat related to another
> > discussion we've been having about copyright, and it may be worth
> > considerin
On 12/01/2016 02:13 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:50:42PM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> I completely agree that we should credit (and thank) contributors. I'm
>> not sure if I'm doing things correctly, but when I'm dealing with a bug
>> and users contribute patches or edit
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:50:42PM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> I completely agree that we should credit (and thank) contributors. I'm
> not sure if I'm doing things correctly, but when I'm dealing with a bug
> and users contribute patches or edits to ebuilds, I try to credit them
> in my commit
On 11/30/2016 01:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> I'm quite sure this angry rant won't be pleasant to read for anybody,
> but still I believe this post serves the good of Gentoo and this issue
> is technical enough to be discussed on gentoo-dev. Also gentoo-pr list
> seems retired anyway.
>
> This is
Hi Matthew,
Please take my deepest excuses for unjustly blaming you, now I see that
my perception was plain wrong in being so blindly emotional.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:43:36PM -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
> While I did see your PR and bug if I remember correctly I didn't
> actually use your co
On 11/30/2016 05:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
I beg affiliated Gentoo developers to stay sane and be thinking not just
about numbers of your commits, but also about community spirit and
relationships. Of course inexperienced contributor gets t
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:23:56 PM EST Andrey Utkin wrote:
> I'm quite sure this angry rant won't be pleasant to read for anybody,
> but still I believe this post serves the good of Gentoo and this issue
> is technical enough to be discussed on gentoo-dev. Also gentoo-pr list
> seems retire
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:27:17AM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> One more reason to use merge commits for pull requests: original
> author commits with proper authorship will be retained.
>
> Yes, I know that some people are unhappy with non-linear history,
> but this is how git works, so there
On 11/30/2016 03:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> I'm quite sure this angry rant won't be pleasant to read for anybody,
> but still I believe this post serves the good of Gentoo and this issue
> is technical enough to be discussed on gentoo-dev. Also gentoo-pr list
> seems retired anyway.
>
> This is
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:17:16 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrey Utkin
> wrote:
> >
> > I beg affiliated Gentoo developers to stay sane and be thinking not just
> > about numbers of your commits, but also about community spirit and
> > relationships. Of course inex
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:23:56PM +, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> The difference between my submission and final variant by Matthew is big
> in number of lines, but is trivial in content as you can see below, so I
> don't believe that Matthew has written his variant from scratch on his
> own (he hasn
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 30.11.2016 kell 21:23, kirjutas Andrey Utkin:
> My PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/2765
>
> My bugzilla ticket linked to it:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599088
>
> After my pull request from Nov 6, the following commit gets into
> mainline:
>
> commi
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
>
> I beg affiliated Gentoo developers to stay sane and be thinking not just
> about numbers of your commits, but also about community spirit and
> relationships. Of course inexperienced contributor gets things not right
> first. In such cases,
I'm quite sure this angry rant won't be pleasant to read for anybody,
but still I believe this post serves the good of Gentoo and this issue
is technical enough to be discussed on gentoo-dev. Also gentoo-pr list
seems retired anyway.
This is a second time I've got into a situation when a new ebuil
14 matches
Mail list logo
