Re: [gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls

2010-08-23 Thread Tom Knight
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:56:23PM +0200, Piotr Jaroszy??ski wrote: > Apparently I don't even have a dev forum account set up If anyone wants their developer status on the forums who doesn't have it then send us an e-mail to forum-m...@gentoo.org or pop into #gentoo-forums and we'll sort it out fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls

2010-08-23 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
> as we discussed on scons.eclass thread at -dev ml we should have some > nice naming scheme for use_xxx calls with cmake and scons. And it should > be done in same fashion. for both So please head up to the formus poll > [1] and vote for your favorite. Apparently I don't even have a dev forum acc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls

2010-08-23 Thread Alec Warner
2010/8/23 Tomáš Chvátal : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > as we discussed on scons.eclass thread at -dev ml we should have some > nice naming scheme for use_xxx calls with cmake and scons. And it should > be done in same fashion. for both So please head up to the formus

[gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls

2010-08-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, as we discussed on scons.eclass thread at -dev ml we should have some nice naming scheme for use_xxx calls with cmake and scons. And it should be done in same fashion. for both So please head up to the formus poll [1] and vote for your favorite. T