Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
> Bundling few libs and bundling 40 of them is bit of difference, will YOU do
> the audit?
> Also other teams actively work on the unbundling, while there is track of no
> will to actually make it buildable with system libs.
>
> Also the security is not the only problem he
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Bundling few libs and bundling 40 of them is bit of difference, will YOU do
> the audit?
We don't require security audits for packages to be in portage. Any
package can have a security problem, whether it is in a bundled lib or
otherwise. B
Dne So 1. prosince 2012 06:42:13, Rich Freeman napsal(a):
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tomáš Chvátal
wrote:
> > Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a):
> >> media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin -> this package is "special", it's
> >> maintained by a proxy maintainer but it
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a):
>> media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin -> this package is "special", it's
>> maintained by a proxy maintainer but it was reassigned to
>> maintainer-needed instead of proxy-maint herd
Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a):
> media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin -> this package is "special", it's
> maintained by a proxy maintainer but it was reassigned to
> maintainer-needed instead of proxy-maint herd. Was reviewing to reassign
> it when I saw:
> https://bugs.
media-gfx/xv
sys-apps/more
media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin -> this package is "special", it's
maintained by a proxy maintainer but it was reassigned to
maintainer-needed instead of proxy-maint herd. Was reviewing to reassign
it when I saw:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=251494
that I
