Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due iluxa retirement

2012-03-19 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 03/19/2012 11:00 PM, David Leverton wrote: >> >> On 19 March 2012 06:05, Samuli Suominen  wrote: >>> >>> dev-cpp/cppserv would need working dev-cpp/sptk and we have none: >>> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402149#c9 >>> >>> t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due iluxa retirement

2012-03-19 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/19/2012 11:00 PM, David Leverton wrote: On 19 March 2012 06:05, Samuli Suominen wrote: dev-cpp/cppserv would need working dev-cpp/sptk and we have none: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402149#c9 the only working versions got marked as "obsolete" by upstream due to "undisclosed re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due iluxa retirement

2012-03-19 Thread David Leverton
On 19 March 2012 06:05, Samuli Suominen wrote: > dev-cpp/cppserv would need working dev-cpp/sptk and we have none: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402149#c9 > > the only working versions got marked as "obsolete" by upstream due to > "undisclosed reasons" whatever that means > Not that

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due iluxa retirement

2012-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-cpp/cppserv Thanks for taking them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part