Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC and SystemD Config File Parity

2012-08-17 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 03:23:52 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: > This isn't a topic meant for bike shedding, but just kind of loose > exploratory inquiry. I saw a bug report about adding systemd's > tmpfiles.d config format support to OpenRC (accomplished) and then > some discussion about adding

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC and SystemD Config File Parity

2012-08-16 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:33 AM, wrote: > config file formats differs a lot, for OpenRC it's shell script, while > for SystemD Microsoft ini/XDG Desktop Entry Specification. Sorry, just to clarify and reiterate what I said before -- I am excluding Unit files from this discussion, for obvious rea

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC and SystemD Config File Parity

2012-08-16 Thread heroxbd
"Jason A. Donenfeld" writes: > To what degree is there parity of configuration formats between OpenRC > and SystemD? Obviously there will never be any sort of parity ever for > Unit files, but what about for the general parameters of the system? > machine-id, locale, timezone, hostname, et cetera

[gentoo-dev] OpenRC and SystemD Config File Parity

2012-08-16 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hey everyone, This isn't a topic meant for bike shedding, but just kind of loose exploratory inquiry. I saw a bug report about adding systemd's tmpfiles.d config format support to OpenRC (accomplished) and then some discussion about adding an ebuild utility function (dotmpfiles_d) or digging up so