On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:55:18PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mar, 06-11-2012 a las 00:02 -0600, William Hubbs escribió:
> > All,
> >
> > I would like to make OpenRC-0.11.4 the next stable candidate for OpenRC.
> > We need it before we can stable a newer genkernel, and releng also needs
> > it
El mar, 06-11-2012 a las 00:02 -0600, William Hubbs escribió:
> All,
>
> I would like to make OpenRC-0.11.4 the next stable candidate for OpenRC.
> We need it before we can stable a newer genkernel, and releng also needs
> it stable for the install cds. Because of this, I am interested in
> moving
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2012 09:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:29:05AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 06/11/12 05:17 AM, XMs wrote:
>>> After upgrade i got this: …
* The dep
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:29:05AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/11/12 05:17 AM, XMs wrote:
> > After upgrade i got this: …
> >> * The dependency data could not be migrated to /run/openrc
> > … I don't have /run/ in my system and can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/11/12 05:17 AM, XMs wrote:
> After upgrade i got this: …
>> * The dependency data could not be migrated to /run/openrc
> … I don't have /run/ in my system and can't find anything about it
> in FHS (by «man hier», maybe i have old version?). Doe
After upgrade i got this:
…
> * The dependency data could not be migrated to /run/openrc
…
I don't have /run/ in my system and can't find anything about it in FHS (by
«man hier», maybe i have old version?). Does it mean i have to create /run/
directory, or OpenRC still can work without it?
signatu
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:02:35AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> In other words, I need testers. So, if you aren't running
> OpenRC-0.11.4,, and you are willing to test for regressions, please
> upgrade and file bugs asap, especially if you find regressions.
Likewise, I'd like to call for testing f
All,
I would like to make OpenRC-0.11.4 the next stable candidate for OpenRC.
We need it before we can stable a newer genkernel, and releng also needs
it stable for the install cds. Because of this, I am interested in
moving it to stable faster than 30 days (I'm thinking more like 14).
In other w
