On Tuesday 14 October 2014 16:02:20 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:52:03AM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > On 10/14/14 05:22, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > For compatibility and migration support, we've kept the old OpenLDAP
> > > 2.3.x ebuilds in the tree for nearly 5 years.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:52:03AM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 10/14/14 05:22, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > For compatibility and migration support, we've kept the old OpenLDAP
> > 2.3.x ebuilds in the tree for nearly 5 years.
>
> And you better keep them for a while, because some of us are s
On 10/14/14 05:22, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> For compatibility and migration support, we've kept the old OpenLDAP
> 2.3.x ebuilds in the tree for nearly 5 years.
And you better keep them for a while, because some of us are stuck with
2.3, and mixed operation (e.g. master 2.4, slaves 2.3) is not s
For compatibility and migration support, we've kept the old OpenLDAP
2.3.x ebuilds in the tree for nearly 5 years.
OpenLDAP-2.4.x first went to stable 2009/11/04.
package.mask has blocked
