Re: [gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-14 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi Peter, On 11/14/2017 07:33 AM, Peter Volkov wrote: > Samuel, probably I miss something but this should work out of box: > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Binary_package_guide#Web_based_binary_package_host > > Or do you mean something else? >   Yes, you're right. I miss that when I read that page

Re: [gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-14 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi, On 11/14/2017 03:04 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > The biggest issue you will have with doing these types of builds, > though, is dealing with the various use flag differences that various > consumer systems may have. From what little I've played with binary > builds, if you want to offer bin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-14 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
On 14/11/17 02:33 AM, Peter Volkov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Samuel Bernardo > mailto:samuelbernardo.m...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > The only feature that would be useful for now is emerge obtaining the > > precompiled binary packages to install in containers/VMs from http > ra

Re: [gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-13 Thread Peter Volkov
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Samuel Bernardo < samuelbernardo.m...@gmail.com> wrote: The only feature that would be useful for now is emerge obtaining the > precompiled binary packages to install in containers/VMs from http > rather than nfs[1]. > Samuel, probably I miss something but this sh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-13 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi Michał, On 11/11/2017 08:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > You've put a lot of theory in here but not really a single sentence > on what needs to be done. I'm aware that some people used to be working > on adding some OBS ebuilds to Gentoo but I've no clue about their goal. > > Long story short, if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-11 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu czw, 09.11.2017 o godzinie 23∶03 +, użytkownik Samuel Bernardo napisał: > Hi, > > I send this email to know the devs opinion about Gentoo integration with > Open Build Service[1]. > > When creating specialized images and using an automated process for > testing before deployment, I thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi, > > I send this email to know the devs opinion about Gentoo integration with > Open Build Service[1]. It sounds like an interesting idea. I've long thought that making our binary package story more compelling would greatly improve the d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-09 Thread Damo Brisbane
My two cents worth, I think broader features not necessarily better; to draw an analogy, dotGo 2015 - Rob Pike - Simplicity is Complicated , ".. a lot of people talk about tooling... but the real reason [that the go language is sucessful] is simplicity.

[gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-09 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi, I send this email to know the devs opinion about Gentoo integration with Open Build Service[1]. When creating specialized images and using an automated process for testing before deployment, I think that Open Build Service would be useful. It already support all major binary based distros and