On 31/10/12 20:17, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
eclass/ handling should go to repoman and the automated ChangeLog process,
should be rather straight forward for knowing person.
Perhaps, but right now the policy is to update it, so do it. The
po
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> eclass/ handling should go to repoman and the automated ChangeLog process,
> should be rather straight forward for knowing person.
Perhaps, but right now the policy is to update it, so do it. The
policy is also to post eclass changes for
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:26:14 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> I agree, that'd make the whole thing easier. But until repoman can
> commit in eclass/ it shouldn't be that hard to just run echangelog ,
> as "inefficient" as that may be. :)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390651
jer
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:26:14 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 31/10/12 12:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > On 31/10/12 17:39, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:35:41 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> -BEGI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 12:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 31/10/12 17:39, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:35:41 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
>> wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis Ba
On 31/10/12 17:39, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:35:41 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600 Ryan Hill
wrote: [...]
The file is pointless if not everyone is
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:35:41 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600 Ryan Hill
> > wrote: [...]
> >>> The file is pointless if not everyone is using it. I've
> >>> of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600 Ryan Hill
> wrote: [...]
>>> The file is pointless if not everyone is using it. I've
>>> offered to remove the file before, and I'm reoffering to do so
>>> now.
>>
>>
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
[...]
> > The file is pointless if not everyone is using it. I've offered to
> > remove the file before, and I'm reoffering to do so now.
>
> It's pointy enough for most uses. Let's keep it that way.
I would like to know what are those uses.