On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Raúl Porcel wrote:
> On 07/22/2011 03:11 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> Hello fellow devs,
>> [snip]
>
> Yey i'm number two :D
>
You're a bot, you don't count. ;)
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
On 07/22/2011 03:11 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Hello fellow devs,
> [snip]
Yey i'm number two :D
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
>> [2]
>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
>
> It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest
> commits look to be the likely cause.
>
>
Each u
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:04:27 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
> >> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >>
> >>> So go claim your commits,
> >>
> >> Great wo
On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
>> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>>
>>> So go claim your commits,
>>
>> Great work!
>>
>>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
>>> [2]
>>> http://git-exp.ov
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:29:01 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
> > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >
> >> So go claim your commits,
> >
> > Great work!
> >
> >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
> >> [
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
>> So go claim your commits,
>
> Great work!
>
>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
>> [2]
>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
>
>
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> So go claim your commits,
Great work!
> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo
> [2]
> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest
commi
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky :
> After 3 weeks of crunching (or was it more?) Ohloh machines finally spit
> out updated statistics, removing few warnings from our project page
> (such as "Decreasing year-over-year development activity""). Updates are
> faster of course so our stats shouldn't be o
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky :
> Hello fellow devs,
>
> some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been
> outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for
> some reason :-)
>
> One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on
> cvs->git conv
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky :
> Hello fellow devs,
>
> some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been
> outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for
> some reason :-)
>
> One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on
> cvs->git conv
Hello fellow devs,
some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been
outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for
some reason :-)
One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on
cvs->git conversion and keep our experimental conversion re
12 matches
Mail list logo