Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-31 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Raúl Porcel wrote: > On 07/22/2011 03:11 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >> Hello fellow devs, >> [snip] > > Yey i'm number two :D > You're a bot, you don't count. ;) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-31 Thread Raúl Porcel
On 07/22/2011 03:11 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > Hello fellow devs, > [snip] Yey i'm number two :D

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-27 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo >> [2] >> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > > It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest > commits look to be the likely cause. > > Each u

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-25 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:04:27 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > >> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > >> > >>> So go claim your commits, > >> > >> Great wo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 >> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >> >>> So go claim your commits, >> >> Great work! >> >>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo >>> [2] >>> http://git-exp.ov

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-25 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:29:01 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers > wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > > >> So go claim your commits, > > > > Great work! > > > >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > >> [

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > >> So go claim your commits, > > Great work! > >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo >> [2] >> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-25 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > So go claim your commits, Great work! > [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > [2] > http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest commi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-23 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky : > After 3 weeks of crunching (or was it more?) Ohloh machines finally spit > out updated statistics, removing few warnings from our project page > (such as "Decreasing year-over-year development activity""). Updates are > faster of course so our stats shouldn't be o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-22 Thread Arun Raghavan
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky : > Hello fellow devs, > > some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been > outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for > some reason :-) > > One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on > cvs->git conv

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-22 Thread Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky : > Hello fellow devs, > > some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been > outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for > some reason :-) > > One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on > cvs->git conv

[gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated

2011-07-22 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Hello fellow devs, some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for some reason :-) One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on cvs->git conversion and keep our experimental conversion re