Re: [gentoo-dev] OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > That's yet another reason why I'd like package maintainers to > push their changes into the oss-qm repo. That would be a great > help for others having to deal with the same package. nothing is stopping individual maintainers from contribut

Re: [gentoo-dev] OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:44:58 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326991 And [2]. jer [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322157

Re: [gentoo-dev] OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:58:49 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > perhaps you remember the discussion of oss-qm + git-repos several > weeks ago. I remember a lacklustre discussion on this mailing list (sping was with you, a couple of others were at best discussing the shortcomings

[gentoo-dev] OSS-QM again ...

2010-08-17 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, perhaps you remember the discussion of oss-qm + git-repos several weeks ago. Just to add another point: I'm going to add an automatic notification system on new changes, so upstreams and other parties can notified automatically, w/o additional manual intervention. That's yet another