On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 06/11/13 08:00 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 11/06/2013 02:11 PM, Thomas D. wrote:
>>
>>> This is going OT but I cannot leave this statement uncommented,
>>> because from my knowledge this is wrong/you are hiding important
>>> information eve
On 06/11/13 08:00 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 02:11 PM, Thomas D. wrote:
>
>> This is going OT but I cannot leave this statement uncommented,
>> because from my knowledge this is wrong/you are hiding important
>> information everyone should know about:
>
> I figure everyone here i
Hi,
Duncan wrote:
> Meanwhile, another question for Thomas. Is this "certificate stapling"
> the same thing google chrome is now doing for the google site, that
> enabled it to detect the (I think it was) Iranian and/or Chinese CA
> tampering, allowing them to say a "google" cert was valid tha
mingdao posted on Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:13:34 -0600 as excerpted:
> Thanks for the detailed explanation, Thomas.
>
> Now, if any one of us turned off OCSP as Michael suggested, what should
> one do after turning it back on? Could there now be certificates trusted
> there which should not be?
AFAIK
