Heya,
Christina Fullam write:
> Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While
> that information is not required perhaps it should be if we are to make
> intelligent votes - sorry this isnt a popularity contest so give us some
> content to review.
I put my little manife
> Those who have accepted though havent sent information regarding why we
> should vote for them:
Since it's almost time to vote, here's a collection of my thoughts
about the council:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~amne/stuff/councilnomination.txt
If something is unclear or you have further questions, fe
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:38:16 -0700
Christina Fullam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) What you will do
> 2) Why you will do it
> 3) How you will do it
> 4) What is the timescale for doing it
> 5) What experience do you have with this or a similar role
> 6) Why do you think you are qualified
> 7) How
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:38:16 -0700
Christina Fullam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Although I've mentioned quite a bit, I feel that some of these
questions still need addressing... This lot can probably be added to
my candidate info stuffs/platform thingie on the site...
[..snip..]
> 1) What you will
Yesterday night I tried to reply but I was too tired...
Christina Fullam wrote:
> Just a reminder about nominations and voting...
> If anyone is still interested in running, you have one week left for
> nominations.
> Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While
> that
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:25:56 +0200
"Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've said my piece. You'll vote for me if you agree with my
> > technical decisions and you find yourself siding with me (even
> > mentally) in the few discussions I take part in on -dev and #-dev.
>
> I can't say
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 14:25 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> I can't say much about your technical decisions because I haven't
> consciously seen any, I rarely see you take part in any discussions.
Maybe that's because -dev wasn't a forum for technical discussion.
Hopefully that might change.
>
Hello Roy!
I've said my piece. You'll vote for me if you agree with my technical
decisions and you find yourself siding with me (even mentally) in the
few discussions I take part in on -dev and #-dev.
I can't say much about your technical decisions because I haven't
consciously seen any, I r
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 17:38 -0700, Christina Fullam wrote:
> Just a reminder about nominations and voting...
> If anyone is still interested in running, you have one week left for
> nominations.
> Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While
> that information is not req
Just a reminder about nominations and voting...
If anyone is still interested in running, you have one week left for
nominations.
Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While
that information is not required perhaps it should be if we are to make
intelligent votes - sorr
10 matches
Mail list logo
