Dnia 2014-11-10, o godz. 22:18:01
Michał Górny napisał(a):
> Hello, developers.
>
> I'm planning to commit this news item before >=2.1-r90 goes stable.
> I have rewritten the message to be more user-oriented like Rich
> suggested (big thanks to you!) and added a paragraph about loading
> bashcom
Dnia 2014-11-20, o godz. 11:58:59
Diamond napisał(a):
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:18:01 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Hello, developers.
> >
> > I'm planning to commit this news item before >=2.1-r90 goes stable.
>
> It's pretty strange, but after the last "emerge -1uDN world" system
> updat
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:18:01 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, developers.
>
> I'm planning to commit this news item before >=2.1-r90 goes stable.
It's pretty strange, but after the last "emerge -1uDN world" system
update I lost bash-complition. It was removed
(app-admin/eselect-bashcomp-1.3.6
* Michał Górny schrieb am 11.11.14 um 12:06 Uhr:
Dnia 2014-11-11, o godz. 09:53:58
Marc Schiffbauer napisał(a):
* Michał Górny schrieb am 10.11.14 um 22:18 Uhr:
>Hello, developers.
>
>I'm planning to commit this news item before >=2.1-r90 goes stable.
>I have rewritten the message to be more u
Dnia 2014-11-11, o godz. 09:53:58
Marc Schiffbauer napisał(a):
> * Michał Górny schrieb am 10.11.14 um 22:18 Uhr:
> >Hello, developers.
> >
> >I'm planning to commit this news item before >=2.1-r90 goes stable.
> >I have rewritten the message to be more user-oriented like Rich
> >suggested (big t
Dnia 2014-11-11, o godz. 09:53:58
Marc Schiffbauer napisał(a):
> * Michał Górny schrieb am 10.11.14 um 22:18 Uhr:
> >Hello, developers.
> >
> >I'm planning to commit this news item before >=2.1-r90 goes stable.
> >I have rewritten the message to be more user-oriented like Rich
> >suggested (big t
* Michał Górny schrieb am 10.11.14 um 22:18 Uhr:
Hello, developers.
I'm planning to commit this news item before >=2.1-r90 goes stable.
I have rewritten the message to be more user-oriented like Rich
suggested (big thanks to you!) and added a paragraph about loading
bashcomp in bashrc.
Please r
Hello, developers.
I'm planning to commit this news item before >=2.1-r90 goes stable.
I have rewritten the message to be more user-oriented like Rich
suggested (big thanks to you!) and added a paragraph about loading
bashcomp in bashrc.
Please review.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Title: bash-
Dnia 2014-10-14, o godz. 02:41:58
Peter Stuge napisał(a):
> Peter Stuge wrote:
> > There is a severe behavioral penalty!
>
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > I really do not want that to be chosen for me.
> >
> > Well, then all you need to do is tell eselect to disable them, etc.
>
> Well, but see ab
Dnia 2014-10-13, o godz. 12:23:52
Pacho Ramos napisał(a):
> El lun, 13-10-2014 a las 11:35 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > Please review the following news item.
> [...]
> > The current eselect-bashcomp setup will *not* be migrated. It may be
> > necessary to rebuild packages installing complet
On Tue Oct 14 03:32:32 2014 Peter Stuge wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > > the new framework is opt-out rather than opt-in.
> > >
> > > Why is it desirable to make that change?
> >
> > there is no longer a performance penalty
>
> There is a severe behavioral penalty!
>
>
> > We think that m
Peter Stuge wrote:
> There is a severe behavioral penalty!
Rich Freeman wrote:
> > I really do not want that to be chosen for me.
>
> Well, then all you need to do is tell eselect to disable them, etc.
Well, but see above - this is a huge change in behavior - I really
don't think that should be
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> I really do not want that to be chosen for me.
>
> Opt-out is not cool. :(
>
Well, then all you need to do is tell eselect to disable them, etc.
It always seemed pointless to me that there are a million bash
completion filters installed on
Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> the new framework is opt-out rather than opt-in.
> >
> > Why is it desirable to make that change?
>
> there is no longer a performance penalty
There is a severe behavioral penalty!
> We think that most users will prefer to just leave everything enabled now.
I really do
Disregard previous fat-finger reply...
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Michał Górny wrote:
>> the new framework is opt-out rather than opt-in.
>
> Why is it desirable to make that change?
>
See my previous email:
3. Unlike in the past, there is no longer a performance pena
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Michał Górny wrote:
>> the new framework is opt-out rather than opt-in.
>
> Why is it desirable to make that change?
>
>
> //Peter
Michał Górny wrote:
> the new framework is opt-out rather than opt-in.
Why is it desirable to make that change?
//Peter
pgpAbh_XiMjXl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:37:19AM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 13/10/14 05:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Please review the following news item.
> >
> > -
> >
> > Title: bash-completion-2.1-r90
> > Author: Michał Górny
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > Posted: -MM-DD
> > Revision: 1
> > Ne
On 13/10/14 05:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Please review the following news item.
>
> -
>
> Title: bash-completion-2.1-r90
> Author: Michał Górny
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: -MM-DD
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Installed:
> Starting with app-shells/bash-c
El lun, 13-10-2014 a las 11:35 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> Please review the following news item.
[...]
> The current eselect-bashcomp setup will *not* be migrated. It may be
> necessary to rebuild packages installing completions after the upgrade,
> and remove old configuration symlinks afterw
Please review the following news item.
-
Title: bash-completion-2.1-r90
Author: Michał Górny
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: -MM-DD
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
21 matches
Mail list logo
