On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:54:19PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 8/17/21 2:24 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 01:27:45PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:40 AM Anthony G. Basile
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> Can I get feedback
On 8/17/21 2:24 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 01:27:45PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:40 AM Anthony G. Basile
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Can I get feedback on the following news item? (BTW, thanks soap)
>>>
>>> Title: uClibc-ng retiremen
On 8/17/21 2:08 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 8/17/2021 13:49, Sam James wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 17 Aug 2021, at 16:19, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> According to the uClibc-ng website, 1.0.38 was released earlier this year
>>> (March 27th). Was an announcement put out somewhere about the p
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 01:27:45PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:40 AM Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Can I get feedback on the following news item? (BTW, thanks soap)
> >
> > Title: uClibc-ng retirement on 2023/01/01
> > Author: Anthony G. Basile
On 8/17/2021 13:49, Sam James wrote:
>
>
>> On 17 Aug 2021, at 16:19, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> According to the uClibc-ng website, 1.0.38 was released earlier this year
>> (March 27th). Was an announcement put out somewhere about the project not
>> being maintained any further beyon
> On 17 Aug 2021, at 16:19, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> [snip]
>
> According to the uClibc-ng website, 1.0.38 was released earlier this year
> (March 27th). Was an announcement put out somewhere about the project not
> being maintained any further beyond that release, or has it gone quiet after
> t
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:40 AM Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can I get feedback on the following news item? (BTW, thanks soap)
>
> Title: uClibc-ng retirement on 2023/01/01
> Author: Anthony G. Basile
> Posted: 2021-08-15
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 2.0
> Display-If-Profil
On 8/17/2021 07:40, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can I get feedback on the following news item? (BTW, thanks soap)
>
> Title: uClibc-ng retirement on 2023/01/01
> Author: Anthony G. Basile
> Posted: 2021-08-15
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 2.0
> Display-If-Profile: default/li
17.08.2021 12:40, Anthony G. Basile пишет:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can I get feedback on the following news item? (BTW, thanks soap)
>
> Title: uClibc-ng retirement on 2023/01/01
> Author: Anthony G. Basile
> Posted: 2021-08-15
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 2.0
> Display-If-Profile: default/linu
Hi everyone,
Can I get feedback on the following news item? (BTW, thanks soap)
Title: uClibc-ng retirement on 2023/01/01
Author: Anthony G. Basile
Posted: 2021-08-15
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Profile: default/linux/uclibc/*
uClibc-ng is mostly abandoned upstream, and since m
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:37:52 -0500
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> This will make sure all executables link directly against libc.so.0
> (as reported by `readelf -d`) rather than via sym links like
> libdl.so.0 -> libc.so.0. Then upgrade from 1.0.19 to 1.0.20 without
> symlink-combat:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:37:52PM -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> 0. Because of changes in the library structure in previous versions,
> make sure you are working with 1.0.19 and rebuild world using
>
> emerge -evq @world
--verbose --quiet? just emerge -e @world is probably better.
>
> 7.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Anthony G. Basile:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Attached you'll find a news item for uclibc-ng. I'd like to push
> it out in a few days.
>
>> This will make sure all executables link directly against
>> libc.so.0 (as
should be "all **the** executables
On 2/8/17 3:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:37:52PM -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Attached you'll find a news item for uclibc-ng. I'd like to push it out
>> in a few days.
>>
>
>> This will make sure all executables link directly against libc.so.0 (
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:37:52PM -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Attached you'll find a news item for uclibc-ng. I'd like to push it out
> in a few days.
>
> This will make sure all executables link directly against libc.so.0 (as
> reported by `readelf -d`) rather than via
Hi everyone,
Attached you'll find a news item for uclibc-ng. I'd like to push it out
in a few days.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
Title: Upgrade to
16 matches
Mail list logo
