On 25/02/14 15:26, Thomas D. wrote:
> No, not locations. My choice was not to use systemd. Now a package,
> sys-fs/udev, turns into systemd-udev...
>
> Also: If it wouldn't be possible to keep sys-fs/udev as it was I
> wouldn't bother that much. But as said, Lars (Polynomial-C) showed us
> that we
On 02/26/2014 6:44 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> Most future Linux systems that are based off of mainstream
>> distributions will *have* to use systemd+udev in order to
>> achieve maximum functionality.
>
> Certainly!
Clarification: I wasn't implying that that was entirely a go
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
>
> I don't see a need for mentioning that the actual configuration is
> located in "/lib/systemd/network/..." in the NEWS item.
I think it makes sense to keep this in. If somebody doesn't like the
default persistent naming conventions then they'
Joshua Kinard wrote:
> Most future Linux systems that are based off of mainstream
> distributions will *have* to use systemd+udev in order to
> achieve maximum functionality.
Certainly!
And I think the reason systemd gains traction is that such maximum
functionality can easily include various thi
On 02/25/2014 8:24 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> If someone is willing to change his device manager because a file or
> directory name is 'systemd', then by all means, sounds very logical
> system maintaince, not.
>
> - Samuli
There is actually a kind of psychological effect on doing it this w
Hi,
I like your (Alex) new proposal, but I have the following annotations:
> As of sys-fs/udev-210, the options CONFIG_FHANDLE and CONFIG_NET
> are now required in the kernel. A warning will be issued if they
> are missing when you upgrade. See the package's README in
> /usr/share/doc/udev-210/ f
Title: >=sys-fs/udev-210 upgrade
Author: Samuli Suominen
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-02-25
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udev/upgrade#udev_208_to_210
[2]
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceN
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I haven't looked into the details as to why a config file is stored in
> /lib/systemd, but I imagine that they're trying to store settings in
> one place and have them applied to multiple executables (though
> obviously by overriding the rule
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
>>> Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite
>>> "/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" via "/etc/udev/rules.d"...
>>
>> I don't see why not - from the news item:
On 25/02/14 14:18, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> line 16 ("renamed the file to
>> /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules") and line 18 ("you can
>> override in /etc/systemd/network/") doesn't end with punctuation.
>>
>>
>> Did I get this right? I am
Hi,
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
>> Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite
>> "/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" via "/etc/udev/rules.d"...
>
> I don't see why not - from the news item:
> So, to clarify, you can override the new .rules f
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
> Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite
> "/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" via "/etc/udev/rules.d"...
I don't see why not - from the news item:
So, to clarify, you can override the new .rules file or the .link file in /etc
but u
On 02/25/2014 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> line 16 ("renamed the file to
> /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules") and line 18 ("you can
> override in /etc/systemd/network/") doesn't end with punctuation.
>
>
> Did I get this right? I am using udev to give my interfaces custom names
>
Hi,
line 16 ("renamed the file to
/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules") and line 18 ("you can
override in /etc/systemd/network/") doesn't end with punctuation.
Did I get this right? I am using udev to give my interfaces custom names
and I am not a systemd user but to keep my setup working
On 25/02/14 13:03, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 5:27 AM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
>>> taken into account any concerns, but please check
>>> the grammar part
On 02/25/2014 5:27 AM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
>> taken into account any concerns, but please check
>> the grammar part. Thanks!
>>
>> - Samuli
>
> CONFIG_DMIID isn'
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
> taken into account any concerns, but please check
> the grammar part. Thanks!
>
> - Samuli
CONFIG_DMIID isn't available for ARM. Can we make that warning go away
if on
Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
taken into account any concerns, but please check
the grammar part. Thanks!
- Samuli
Title: Upgrade to >=sys-fs/udev-210
Author: Samuli Suominen
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-02-25
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Displa
18 matches
Mail list logo
