On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:04:53 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2016, 15:57:36 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
>
> > > > Wrong. PMS specifically requests you to account for such a
> > > > possibility.
> > >
> > > Common sen
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:04:53 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> 1) If a package only ever had one slot, it cannot ever have two
> versions installed at the same time. That guarantee (of only ever one
> slot) can be given for the portage tree (sic). Obviously it doesn't
> work for overlays, but th
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:30:39 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Oh, nice: strictly follow PMS no matter what, right? Then let me
> remind you that not so long time ago I advocated for strictly
> following PMS [1,2], which _allows_ || ( A:= B:= ) construct [3].
>
> But I was _enforced_ by QA to _viol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2016, 15:57:36 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> > > Wrong. PMS specifically requests you to account for such a
> > > possibility.
> >
> > Common sence must prevail over formal approaches. While PMS is
> > great, it is not perfect in
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:49:55 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:14:23 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Dnia 22 lipca 2016 13:00:42 CEST, Andrew Savchenko
> > > napisał(a):
> > > >On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:12:12 +02
On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 15:38:26 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 17:23:48 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:57:36 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
> > > Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > I see no point in trash
On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 17:23:48 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:57:36 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
> > Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> [...]
> > > I see no point in trashing ebuilds with dead code that will never
> > > be used. Though if ther
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:57:36 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
[...]
> > I see no point in trashing ebuilds with dead code that will never
> > be used. Though if there will be a PMS or eclass function with
> > "proper" implementation,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:14:23 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 22 lipca 2016 13:00:42 CEST, Andrew Savchenko
> > napisał(a):
> > >On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:12:12 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> [...]
> > >> Few important QA notes:
> > >>
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:14:23 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 22 lipca 2016 13:00:42 CEST, Andrew Savchenko
> > napisał(a):
> > >On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:12:12 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> [...]
> > >> Few important QA notes:
> > >
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:14:23 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 22 lipca 2016 13:00:42 CEST, Andrew Savchenko
> napisał(a):
> >On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:12:12 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
[...]
> >> Few important QA notes:
> >>
> >> 1. < is lexicographical comparison, so e.g. 1.6.2.2 < 1.6.18.2 gives
>
Dnia 22 lipca 2016 13:00:42 CEST, Andrew Savchenko
napisał(a):
>On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:12:12 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:22:36 +0300
>> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:12:01 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> > > On 07/20/2016 01:13 PM, NP-Hardass wr
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:12:12 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:22:36 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:12:01 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > On 07/20/2016 01:13 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> > > > Display-If-Installed: <=net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.6.18.2
>
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:22:36 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:12:01 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 07/20/2016 01:13 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> > > Display-If-Installed: <=net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.6.18.2
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Starting with net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:14:23 -0500 Austin English wrote:
> On 07/20/2016 12:13 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> > This is the first draft of a news item describing a packaging change for
> > OpenAFS so that we no longer require the DEBUG_RODATA be turned off.
> > Given the security implications of the previ
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:12:01 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 07/20/2016 01:13 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> > Display-If-Installed: <=net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.6.18.2
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Starting with net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.6.18.2, this condition is no longer
> > forced in the ebuild.
>
> Might not
On 07/20/2016 12:13 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> This is the first draft of a news item describing a packaging change for
> OpenAFS so that we no longer require the DEBUG_RODATA be turned off.
> Given the security implications of the previous setting of having
> CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=n, we thought it prud
On 07/20/2016 01:13 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> Display-If-Installed: <=net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.6.18.2
>
> ...
>
> Starting with net-fs/openafs-kernel-1.6.18.2, this condition is no longer
> forced in the ebuild.
Might not that version bound might backfire if someone upgrades before
reading the new
This is the first draft of a news item describing a packaging change for
OpenAFS so that we no longer require the DEBUG_RODATA be turned off.
Given the security implications of the previous setting of having
CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=n, we thought it prudent to ensure that OpenAFS
users get notice of the
19 matches
Mail list logo
