Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag "ps"

2012-06-15 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 14/06/12 10:43 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 06/15/2012 05:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Thursday 14 June 2012 21:16:31 Samuli Suominen wrote: >>> So how about renaming USE="gs" consumers to USE="ps" and making >>> USE="ps" global flag with

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag "ps"

2012-06-14 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 15-06-2012 a las 05:43 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > On 06/15/2012 05:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 14 June 2012 21:16:31 Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> So how about renaming USE="gs" consumers to USE="ps" and making USE="ps" > >> global flag with the proposed description?

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag "ps"

2012-06-14 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 06/15/2012 05:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 14 June 2012 21:16:31 Samuli Suominen wrote: So how about renaming USE="gs" consumers to USE="ps" and making USE="ps" global flag with the proposed description? merging is a good idea. getting away from "ghostscript" is good. i might

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag "ps" (was: USE="gs")

2012-06-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 14 June 2012 21:16:31 Samuli Suominen wrote: > So how about renaming USE="gs" consumers to USE="ps" and making USE="ps" > global flag with the proposed description? merging is a good idea. getting away from "ghostscript" is good. i might suggest expanding "ps" to "postscript" though

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag "ps" (was: USE="gs")

2012-06-14 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 06/15/2012 02:58 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: Samuli Suominen wrote: 9'ish consumers. I propose "Enable support for the PostScript language" Perhaps "ps" or "postscript" instead of the implementation-centric "gs" ? //Peter Ah, you have a point here. We are already using USE="ps": app-misc/r