>
> To summarize, half the categories have 10-50 packages, then there are a
> number of huge ones. If you can get at least 15 packages, it's a
> reasonable starting point for a new category.
>
I wouldn't have a limit like 15 on it. My first thought for checking Lua is
looking in /usr/portage/dev-l
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 08:09 Tue 02 Nov , "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
>> > I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
>> > called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
>>
>> Just
On 08:09 Tue 02 Nov , "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
> > I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
> > called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
>
> Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category?
In
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 04:24, Rafael Goncalves Martins
wrote:
> I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
> called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
+1.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:09 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
>> I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
>> called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
>
> Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category?
On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
> I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
> called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category?
Generally sounds good.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
Hi all,
as said in my blog post [1], I'm planing to improve our support to the
Lua [2] programming language, adding packages for the libraries and
the related software. Actually we already have some libraries on the
tree but they are spread in some categories like dev-lang and
dev-libs.
I think t
