* Mike Gilbert:
> Speaking on behalf of the python team, we are not particularly keen on
> maintaining libraries that are only used by a single package. We have
> too many packages to care for already.
I agree. I know about the various risks of dynamically installing
dependencies, but "pip instal
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 8:44 AM Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> * Michał Górny:
>
> > I presume you want to proxy-maintain all of those packages.
>
> I would want to maintain the "monty" application because it offers
> functionality useful to me. I'm not particularly keen on maintaining
> Python ebuilds
* Michał Górny:
> I presume you want to proxy-maintain all of those packages.
I would want to maintain the "monty" application because it offers
functionality useful to me. I'm not particularly keen on maintaining
Python ebuilds required as dependencies by only one application.
Like everybody el
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:03:53 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 22:27 +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > imagine a Python application "monty" with the following requirements
> > listed in setup.py:
> >
> > install_requires=[
> > 'ham>=1.0',
> > 'spam>=
On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 22:27 +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> imagine a Python application "monty" with the following requirements
> listed in setup.py:
>
> install_requires=[
> 'ham>=1.0',
> 'spam>=2.0',
> 'eggs>=1.5'
> ]
>
> If I want to add "monty" as a new Gentoo p
Hi folks,
imagine a Python application "monty" with the following requirements
listed in setup.py:
install_requires=[
'ham>=1.0',
'spam>=2.0',
'eggs>=1.5'
]
If I want to add "monty" as a new Gentoo package, and if none of "ham",
"spam" and "eggs" are so far available as Gentoo pa
