On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:00:17 -0400
Richard Yao wrote:
>
> You are right. I spoke to ulm about this and the disclaimer can be
> considered separate from the license. Gentoo/FreeBSD will need to
> switch to BSD-2, but aside from that, there is no need for a new
> license.
>
grep shows that a lot
On 03/28/12 21:28, Tim Harder wrote:
> On 2012-03-28 Wed 17:31, Richard Yao wrote:
>>> Gentoo/FreeBSD is currently using the BSD license, but it seems that
>>> this is not the license used by the BSD project:
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
>>> In particular, the FreeBSD l
On 2012-03-28 Wed 17:31, Richard Yao wrote:
> > Gentoo/FreeBSD is currently using the BSD license, but it seems that
> > this is not the license used by the BSD project:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
> > In particular, the FreeBSD license removes the third clause and app
On 03/28/12 20:27, Richard Yao wrote:
> Gentoo/FreeBSD is currently using the BSD license, but it seems that
> this is not the license used by the BSD project:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
>
> In particular, the FreeBSD license removes the third clause and appends
> "
Gentoo/FreeBSD is currently using the BSD license, but it seems that
this is not the license used by the BSD project:
http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
In particular, the FreeBSD license removes the third clause and appends
"The views and conclusions contained in the software
