On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:41:11PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote
> Check the /etc/portage/make.profile symlink. It points to the
> eselected profile. Replace that symlink with a new one pointing to
> the corresponding 17.0 directory.
I just synced and updated world. Profile 17.0 exists for
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:41:11PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote
> Am Sonntag, 11. Juni 2017, 20:39:00 CEST schrieb Walter Dnes:
> > 1) Should I be doing bug reports on the Gentoo bugzilla or upstream?
>
> Gentoo please, though also submitting stuff upstream and linking to
> it in the Gentoo bu
Am Sonntag, 11. Juni 2017, 20:39:00 CEST schrieb Walter Dnes:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 05:15:05PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote
>
> > -> The new profiles will NOT have any entries in profiles.desc
> > yet. For "normal people" that means DO NOT SWITCH to these profiles
> > yet. <-
> >
> > Howev
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017, at 13:39 CDT, "Walter Dnes" wrote:
> 1) Should I be doing bug reports on the Gentoo bugzilla or upstream?
Please check [1] and if not already reported open a bug report blocking
[1] on our bugzilla.
Best,
Matthias
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=gcc-6
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 05:15:05PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote
> -> The new profiles will NOT have any entries in profiles.desc
> yet. For "normal people" that means DO NOT SWITCH to these profiles
> yet. <-
>
> However, if you're involved with toolchain, languages, etc, already
> run gcc-6,
Am Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2017, 22:44:31 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
> Hey all,
>
> as already discussed on IRC, here is a first step towards new 17.0 profile
> sets.
I havent seen any blocking disagreements / arguments, so I'm going to push the
patches later today.
-> The new profiles will N
Am Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2017, 20:53:53 CEST schrieb Michał Górny:
> I think it would also be reasonable to have clang default to the same
> C++ standard for better interoperability.
Makes sense.
>
> Sadly, unless I'm mistaken changing the defaults for both will require
> patching the code.
Just
On śro, 2017-06-07 at 23:05 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:44:31 +0200
> "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
>
> > 2) Switch GCC from default-non-PIE to default-PIE executables.
>
> Yay \o/. It's a major change though. Will qa@ write us some docs
> on the topic? Landing page:
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017, at 15:44 CDT, "Andreas K. Huettel"
wrote:
> [...]
> Obviously we're now in the test phase and the official switchover
> recommendation
> can only happen after gcc-6 is stable. This is also why I'm not touching
> profiles.desc yet.
>
> Patches following for review (only
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:05:20 +0100
Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> - dev-lang/ocaml will need to be defaulted to pie. ml@
ocaml generates its own asm code and uses gcc to link
historically this caused issues on hardened since gcc had pie in its
specs but the .o files it was linking were definitely n
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:44:31 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> 2) Switch GCC from default-non-PIE to default-PIE executables.
Yay \o/. It's a major change though. Will qa@ write us some docs
on the topic? Landing page:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance#Documentation
C
Hey all,
as already discussed on IRC, here is a first step towards new 17.0 profile
sets.
The switchover from 13.0 to 17.0 is introduced for two reasons:
1) Switch default compiler dialect from gnu++98 (as in <=gcc-5.4) to gnu++14
(as in >=gcc-6).
2) Switch GCC from default-non-PIE to default
12 matches
Mail list logo