This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
On 01 May 2008 05:30:01
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
I'd like a decision on the eight digits thing in PMS:
> No integer pa
On N, 2008-05-01 at 05:30 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
>
(I'll Try again, from correct email address)
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 05:30 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have somethin
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
On Fri, 4 May 2007 14:37:21 -0500
"Karl Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lol, its funny that we must concern ourselves with the needs of
> ""el1te gam3rs"", but I suppose its necessary.
We concern ourselves with the needs of everyone, from our elite users,
to our crapola devs. There are, or s
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 20:43 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 04 May 2007 15:36:51 -0400
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The point of policy is *not* to impede progress. It is supposed to be
> > to provide our users the best quality distribution. If policy gets in
> > the
On Fri, 04 May 2007 15:36:51 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The point of policy is *not* to impede progress. It is supposed to be
> to provide our users the best quality distribution. If policy gets in
> the way of progress without gain for our users, then the policy needs
>
ect: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 12:15 +0200, "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)" wrote:
> Games are not part of core system, so IMHO, use the ~arch branch to have
> the latest cool version to enjoy, could be a good way to go for those
>
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:53 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> I don't even see how this is a policy discussion at all as the policy is
> more or less clear to me; is it unclear for others? This is an
> enforcement problem, no?
No. It *was* an enforcement problem. The problem has been resolved
already
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 12:15 +0200, "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)" wrote:
> Games are not part of core system, so IMHO, use the ~arch branch to have
> the latest cool version to enjoy, could be a good way to go for those
> el1te gam3rs.
We actively discourage users from using ~arch for stable, sinc
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2007, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> I also don't agree with having an exception for the games herd. As
>> others have questioned, how are games more important than security
>> bumps? If we were considering exceptions, I would argue that allowing
>> the
On Friday 04 May 2007, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> I also don't agree with having an exception for the games herd. As
> others have questioned, how are games more important than security
> bumps? If we were considering exceptions, I would argue that allowing
> the security team to mark pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
José Luis Rivero (yoswink) wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
>>
>> I maintain and play a game called Eternal Lands. I'm a Council member,
>> but not part of the games team/herd.
>>
>> One of the problems games have with stable/unstable/testing/whatever
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 13:11 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote:
>
> ok, agreed, this is a valid point. so i would suggest, that maintainers
> of games where this argument applies, come to special agreements with
> the arch teams - or just file bugreports like this:
>
> "
> although games-foo/lord-of-b
Roy Marples escribió:
On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:15:45 +0200
"José Luis Rivero (yoswink)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ehm, IMHO call it discriminate is a big hard. Are the gnome-2.18 or
beryl users discriminated or they should be using something different
to Gentoo? They only thing people have to do
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 08:11 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007 22:00:05 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What, people deliberately breaking policy that directly leads to
> > breaking stable and not having any working ebuilds for a package in
> > the tree, and then
On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:15:45 +0200
"José Luis Rivero (yoswink)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ehm, IMHO call it discriminate is a big hard. Are the gnome-2.18 or
> beryl users discriminated or they should be using something different
> to Gentoo? They only thing people have to do is use some ~arch
Roy Marples wrote:
I maintain and play a game called Eternal Lands. I'm a Council member,
but not part of the games team/herd.
One of the problems games have with stable/unstable/testing/whatever
keywords is that upstream changes things that in any other application
just would not change. For e
On Thursday 03 May 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> DISCLAIMER: I've not read the bug mentioned as I've lost the email
> with it's number so I may just be talking out of my ass.
there's nothing of value in said bug so having not read it is OK
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Wed, 2 May 2007 22:00:05 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What, people deliberately breaking policy that directly leads to
> breaking stable and not having any working ebuilds for a package in
> the tree, and then refusing to do anything about it is nothing?
>
> > the issue ha
On Wednesday 02 May 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > the issue has been taken care of
>
> You have a conflict of interest in this one. What do other Council
> members who aren't games team members think?
perhaps you should try reading the bug
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Wed, 2 May 2007 16:49:32 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> >
On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> > Gentoo dev list to see.
>
> I would like the council to remind everyone that this i
Petteri Räty wrote:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
I would like the council to remind everyone that this is not appropriate
for any team:
http
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
>
I would like the council to remind everyone that this is not appropriate
for any team:
https://bugs.gent
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
I'd like GLEP 48 [1] to be voted on.
Thanks,
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0048
On Sunday 07 May 2006 15:31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder !
sorry for the delay ... the mail server changes broke a bunch of my automated
scripts :/
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev
30 matches
Mail list logo
