Am Samstag, den 10.12.2005, 17:00 -0800 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ben Skeggs wrote:
> | Am Freitag, den 09.12.2005, 23:12 + schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
> |
> |>2) Users with no X installed will pull in the virtual/x11 package
> |>because there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Skeggs wrote:
| Am Freitag, den 09.12.2005, 23:12 + schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
|
|>2) Users with no X installed will pull in the virtual/x11 package
|>because there is no longer a default virtual.
|
| A user in #gentoo-amd64 ran into issues with
Am Freitag, den 09.12.2005, 23:12 + schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
> 2) Users with no X installed will pull in the virtual/x11 package
> because there is no longer a default virtual.
A user in #gentoo-amd64 ran into issues with this that I reproduced in a
chroot. On a new install, with no X install
Martin Schlemmer wrote:
Will need to do something about the default glu/opengl/xft virtuals as
well ... (you probably did not forget this, just double checking ...)
Yep.
From an email I sent in the past 24 hours:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Done.
>
> I will probably do similar for the other x11
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 23:12 +, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> AREAS WE NEED HELP WITH:
> 1) Porting applications to modular X
> 2) Fixing descriptions for the vast majority of modular packages.
>
>
> OK, it seems like we've now got issues resolved related to the new
> virtual/x11 package. Despite
AREAS WE NEED HELP WITH:
1) Porting applications to modular X
2) Fixing descriptions for the vast majority of modular packages.
OK, it seems like we've now got issues resolved related to the new
virtual/x11 package. Despite all the eyes that looked at it and all the
publicity on lists and else
