Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I plan to remove the virtual/x11 definition from base/virtuals in a
couple of days, because this should provide a full (and non-broken)
replacement.
Done.
I will probably do similar for the other x11 virtuals (particularly xft)
soon, assuming this doesn't break too badl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
| On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|
|>Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|>| As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37
|>| and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this.
|>
|>I've jus
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> | As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37
> | and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this.
>
> I've just committed virtual/x11 to the tree. See
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
| As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37
| and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this.
I've just committed virtual/x11 to the tree. See
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112896 if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lina Pezzella wrote:
| I would want to know exactly how many keywords would be dropped with
| this solution. I would hate to see something that is working perfectly
| fine having support dropped due to syntax troubles in an ebuild...
Portage's lack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:13 AM, Grobian wrote:
On 21-11-2005 19:15:58 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
| virtual/x11 isn't xorg for all profiles.
Perhaps the relevant people (macos?) could get in touch with me,
and we
can figure out what needs to ha
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 00:46, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > I thought GLEP 37 was a way out kind of thing. Like several months if
> > not a year before it can be done.
>
> I figured about the same, but
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112896#c16 begs to differ.
Doug Goldstein wrote:
I thought GLEP 37 was a way out kind of thing. Like several months if
not a year before it can be done.
I figured about the same, but
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112896#c16 begs to differ.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Joshua Baergen wrote:
> | If the list keeps growing maybe we should consider a GLEP 37-style
> | solution, like was suggested by Jason. It would allow us to make any
> | further changes that are required (agreed, hopefully none) without
> | having to change a bunch of packa
On 21-11-2005 19:15:58 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> | virtual/x11 isn't xorg for all profiles.
>
> Perhaps the relevant people (macos?) could get in touch with me, and we
> can figure out what needs to happen.
>
> It may be that we'll need to add x11-base/apple-xfree into the || list
> as well
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua Baergen wrote:
| If the list keeps growing maybe we should consider a GLEP 37-style
| solution, like was suggested by Jason. It would allow us to make any
| further changes that are required (agreed, hopefully none) without
| having to change a
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
It may be that we'll need to add x11-base/apple-xfree into the || list
If the list keeps growing maybe we should consider a GLEP 37-style
solution, like was suggested by Jason. It would allow us to make any
further changes that are required (agreed, hopefully none) withou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
| On Monday 21 November 2005 21:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|
|>Here's the change:
|> "virtual/x11" -> "<=x11-base/xorg-x11-6.99"
|
|
| virtual/x11 isn't xorg for all profiles.
Perhaps the relevant people (macos?) could get in
On Monday 21 November 2005 21:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Here's the change:
> "virtual/x11" -> "<=x11-base/xorg-x11-6.99"
virtual/x11 isn't xorg for all profiles.
Carsten
pgpKJHUHNPisT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
| On Monday 21 November 2005 21:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|
|>Here's the change:
|>"virtual/x11" -> "<=x11-base/xorg-x11-6.99"
|
| Is this the last change? :)
| Just to make sure, I received the broken pieces
On Monday 21 November 2005 21:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Here's the change:
> "virtual/x11" -> "<=x11-base/xorg-x11-6.99"
Is this the last change? :)
Just to make sure, I received the broken pieces of the "old" method, so I
don't really want to take them from the new one, too ;)
--
Die
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Because portage treats the default virtual differently than I was
previously led to believe, everybody who's ported a package to modular X
so far will need to make a small change.
It's really easy, but it might take a bit of time to go through your
p
17 matches
Mail list logo
