Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X (7.0) stable on x86

2006-06-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Friday 30 June 2006 23:06, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > (No, I didn't add evdev to non-Linux > profiles, calm down =) Oh you could have, I've masked the use-expanded useflag anyway ;) But thanks for taking care :) -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X (7.0) stable on x86

2006-06-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Thomas Cort wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:28:30 -0700 > Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - I'm offering to stable any interested arch for 7.1. PPC, SPARC and >> MIPS have already taken me up on this. I will be starting this very soon >> (within 2 hours at most), so respond ASAP if yo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X (7.0) stable on x86

2006-06-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Wernfried Haas wrote: > earlier today i updated my box (without reading the guide because i > haven't gotten this mail yet), and apart from one problem because of > not deleting some files as mentioned in the guide, all went fine. > I also noticed (and someone correct me if i'm wrong here) the smar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X (7.0) stable on x86

2006-06-30 Thread Thomas Cort
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:28:30 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - I'm offering to stable any interested arch for 7.1. PPC, SPARC and > MIPS have already taken me up on this. I will be starting this very soon > (within 2 hours at most), so respond ASAP if you would like to save > you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X (7.0) stable on x86

2006-06-30 Thread Wernfried Haas
Hi, On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:14:01AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > 1. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/modular-x-howto.xml earlier today i updated my box (without reading the guide because i haven't gotten this mail yet), and apart from one problem because of not deleting some files

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X (7.0) stable on x86

2006-06-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > - If you stable your own arch, please also keyword xev and luit in > addition to the various deps of virtual/x11, xorg-x11 and xorg-server. One other thing I forgot to mention -- stable xproto 7.0.5, not 7.0.7. stable: libX11 1.0.1 = xproto 7.0.5 ~arch: libX11 1.0.3 = xpr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X (7.0) stable on x86

2006-06-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I encourage other architectures to stabilize modular X. AMD64, you will > want to go with 7.0 because you also have binary drivers. All other > archs will want to go with 7.1. The modular X package list [2] will help > with this. - I'm offering to stable any interested arc

[gentoo-dev] Modular X (7.0) stable on x86

2006-06-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
I've just spent the past few hours stabilizing modular X.Org 7.0 on x86. This is a reminder of the migration guide [1] and a guide to other arches on how to stabilize it. I have not stabilized most optional packages, instead preferring to wait for any requests to see whether demand exists for them.