On 4/20/06, Stephen P. Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> > On 4/19/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> >>> Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ?
> >> Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it.
> >
> > I can
Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
On 4/19/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ?
Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it.
I can't any ebuild for xserver
(http://www.jabber.no/ejabberd-1.0.0.tar.bz2) (X over
On 4/19/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> > Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ?
>
> Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it.
I can't any ebuild for xserver
(http://www.jabber.no/ejabberd-1.0.0.tar.bz2) (X over vesa fb). Is it
plan
Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ?
Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 3/23/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There aren't really any remaining blockers to keep modular X out of
> ~arch, as far as I can see.
>
> If anyone's got one, please bring it up now. I'm planning to unmask
> later tonight.
>
Is it planned to release some xserver eb
On Thursday 23 March 2006 06:38, Greg KH wrote:
> > i know last time i upgraded, the evdev driver was broken to crap anyways
> > ;)
> The evdev kernel driver, or evdev X driver?
Talking about X driver I suppose...
And I think I sort of know what's the big issue there... scancodes given by X
are d
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:20:01PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 March 2006 19:59, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On Mar 22, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Olivier Crete wrote:
> > > If modular X is used and gnome-base/control-center is not
> > > patched..
> > > gnome-settings-daemon on some ev
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 19:59, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Olivier Crete wrote:
> > If modular X is used and gnome-base/control-center is not
> > patched..
> > gnome-settings-daemon on some evdev combinations...
> >
> > Not sure if that's a blocker... but we should
On Mar 22, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Olivier Crete wrote:
If modular X is used and gnome-base/control-center is not
patched..
gnome-settings-daemon on some evdev combinations...
Not sure if that's a blocker... but we should rush in a new version of
control-center with the patch
Nah, not a blo
On Wed, 2006-22-03 at 15:16 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There aren't really any remaining blockers to keep modular X out of
> ~arch, as far as I can see.
>
> If anyone's got one, please bring it up now. I'm planning to unmask
> later tonight.
If modular X is used and gnome-ba
Hi all,
There aren't really any remaining blockers to keep modular X out of
~arch, as far as I can see.
If anyone's got one, please bring it up now. I'm planning to unmask
later tonight.
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
11 matches
Mail list logo
