On Friday 09 December 2005 08:19 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:09:50AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
> > >a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
> >
> > I'd rather
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
| a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
Quite a contrast with the x11 herd policy: to add packages until there's
10x more than you can reasonab
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:09:50AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
> >a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
>
> I'd rather say that we select packages that evolve and fit the needs and
> kill
Chandler Carruth wrote:
As a user currently, what steps could I take to help this package stay
alive? I will take them as the alternative is to put an unofficial
ebuild up on a webpage.
On my to be killed list I have
transcode <1
avifile
transcode 1 is already there and seems in good sh
Mike Frysinger wrote:
so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
-mike
I'd rather say that we select packages that evolve and fit the needs and
kill what isn't suitable anymore.
There are still many way to shoot
I am not a gentoo developer, but a user, but I have submitted several
fixes for dvdrip in the past, and plan on continuing to use it, and get
it running and working in gentoo. I would be happy to maintain it, or
simply try to more responsively post fixes in the future to Bugzilla if
it would ke
On Thursday 08 December 2005 20:23, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2005 21:10, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
> > a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
>
> No, it's to remove the packages that
On Thursday 08 December 2005 21:10, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
> a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
No, it's to remove the packages that have problems, that requires dependencies
that are badly broken (transcode 0.6
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> If a new maintainer is found, fine, it can remain, but currently the
> resources
> of Video team are limited and we have enough problems to take care of without
> dvdrip.
so the video herd policy is to remove packages
On Thursday 08 December 2005 19:12, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> Er, isn't dvdrip the most popular ripping software on Linux?
Popular, maybe, but there're enough bug to make it a difficult task to
maintain.
Current versions are tested only on transcode 0.6 (I'm sure that at least the
versions that u
On 08/12/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another package is taking a long long way that goes out of portage.
> I'm running out of openings for these mails, you know?
>
> Alternative dvd-ripping software is present in portage, starting from mencoder
> and its frontends, an
On 12/8/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another package is taking a long long way that goes out of portage.
> I'm running out of openings for these mails, you know?
>
> Oh well, media-video/dvdrip has many issues reported in bugzilla (some have
> patches, most haven't), a
Another package is taking a long long way that goes out of portage.
I'm running out of openings for these mails, you know?
Oh well, media-video/dvdrip has many issues reported in bugzilla (some have
patches, most haven't), and depends on a version of transcode with many
issues, too (and force us
13 matches
Mail list logo
