On 29-02-2008 08:12:34 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
> |> Though, if for instance amd64-fbsd would be introduced,
> | Will that happen? (Asking because I might be interested in testing such
> | a setup.)
>
> I would be int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
|> Though, if for instance amd64-fbsd would be introduced,
| Will that happen? (Asking because I might be interested in testing such
| a setup.)
I would be interested as well, especially if based on FreeBSD-7.
| Wouldn't it
Fabian Groffen schrieb:
Though, if for instance amd64-fbsd would be introduced,
Will that happen? (Asking because I might be interested in testing such
a setup.)
I think this keyword should have something more generic arch instead, like
the x64 we use in prefix now
Wouldn't it be more cle
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:40:23 +0100
Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20-02-2008 19:23:26 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
> > "William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has be
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless the work to do that is greater than the value of the change.
It most likely is. And beside of that: amd64 is the technically correct
term. :p
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 20-02-2008 19:23:26 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
> "William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
> > brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
> > support. am
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
> brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
> support. amd64 as a keyword seems a bit odd and off maybe.
>
> What's th
William L. Thomson Jr. a écrit :
Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
support. amd64 as a keyword seems a bit odd and off maybe.
I think we'd already discussed this a while back, and decided not to
c
Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
support. amd64 as a keyword seems a bit odd and off maybe.
What's the possibility of switching amd64 to x86_64?
Unless the work to do that is greater than the value
