On 1/30/12 6:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Agreed with a slight modification — once you've kept the old
> {stable,~arch} version around for a reasonable amount of time (say 30
> days), you should be safe pulling it.
Agreed with a slight modification ;-)
Please make sure that at _any_ given mo
Donnie Berkholz writes:
> Agreed with a slight modification — once you've kept the old
> {stable,~arch} version around for a reasonable amount of time (say 30
> days), you should be safe pulling it.
As long as there are no open bugs on the later ~arch version breaking
other packages.
On 21:33 Sat 28 Jan , Ryan Hill wrote:
> I've run into this three times today, so I'm a little grumpy. When you bump
> to a new ~arch version, please consider keeping at least one previous ~arch
> version around, so if people run into major issues they can at lease try the
> previously install
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> When you bump
> to a new ~arch version, please consider keeping at least one previous ~arch
> version around, so if people run into major issues they can at lease try the
> previously installed version to determine if it's your package at fault.
I've run into this three times today, so I'm a little grumpy. When you bump
to a new ~arch version, please consider keeping at least one previous ~arch
version around, so if people run into major issues they can at lease try the
previously installed version to determine if it's your package at fau
