On Wednesday 15 June 2005 17:08, Marius Mauch wrote:
> Andrej Kacian wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:03:44 +0900
> >
> > Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Is that not a win/win situation? Where exactly is the "bureaucracy"?
> >
> > Maybe I used wrong term - I was thinking about time and
Andrej Kacian wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:03:44 +0900
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is that not a win/win situation? Where exactly is the "bureaucracy"?
Maybe I used wrong term - I was thinking about time and effort spent on
setting up and maintaining the ircbot. I've been in ch
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Jan Kundrát wrote:
>
>
>>Are you awake 24/7/365? If not, I probably misunderstood your message.
>>If someone goes to IRC, he (IMHO) wants to discuss stuff *right now* and
>
>
> right now is when you listener is pleased to listen, ALWAYS.
Sorry, I can't parse this.
>>don'
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 12:03, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:54:20 +0200
>
> Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would be an easy contact point for users. The other way would
> > certainly be still allowed, but it might be easier if there was a
> > fixed "contact" eve
Andrej Kacian wrote:
>>Yes, ChrisWhite in a protocol IRC bot. Also speaks a few million
>>languages, including Japanese.
>
> Who's R2D2 then?
Also a Gentoo developer, living in Toronto, Canada. See the rollcall list...
--
Koon
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:03:44 +0900
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that not a win/win situation? Where exactly is the "bureaucracy"?
Maybe I used wrong term - I was thinking about time and effort spent on
setting up and maintaining the ircbot. I've been in charge of a large botnet
in
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 18:29, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:21:20 +0200
>
> Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not create a "voicebot" that would sit in the irc channel (the
> > subject would refer to it), that developers could send a message to, and
> > that would
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:54:20 +0200
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be an easy contact point for users. The other way would certainly
> be still allowed, but it might be easier if there was a fixed "contact"
> even if that is actually multiple people.
Just out of curiosity -
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 11:29, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> Why needlessly create more artificial "bureaucracy" than is necessary?
> There's nothing wrong with current system, except for one dev (one so
> far, that is) who seems to be allergic to non-devs, and should take a
> vacation or something.
>
>
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:21:20 +0200
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not create a "voicebot" that would sit in the irc channel (the subject
> would refer to it), that developers could send a message to, and that
> would automatically be forwarded to a team of developers. If the bot
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 23:02, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:05:21 +0900
>
> Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for
> > > >>voice to speak to the devs without a 'rtfm & go get a gentoo job'
> > > >>smokescreen ?
> >
Jan Kundrát wrote:
>
> Are you awake 24/7/365? If not, I probably misunderstood your message.
> If someone goes to IRC, he (IMHO) wants to discuss stuff *right now* and
right now is when you listener is pleased to listen, ALWAYS.
> don't want to wait for you to return from job/shopping/vacation
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:56:20 +0200
Thierry Carrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, ChrisWhite in a protocol IRC bot. Also speaks a few million
> languages, including Japanese.
Who's R2D2 then?
--
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian
Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, amd64
pgpx401uApuio.pgp
Des
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Chris White wrote:
>
>>I plan to create somewhat of a consistant contact point between irc users
>>that want a voice in dev.
>
> Are you awake 24/7/365?
Yes, ChrisWhite in a protocol IRC bot. Also speaks a few million
languages, including Japanese.
--
Koon
--
gentoo-dev@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
> Won't work. First it would introduce a single point of failure. If we'd
> really follow this route there has to be a role for this, not a user.
> Then how are people supposed to know about this in teh first place? I
> wouldn't exp
On 6/14/05, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris White wrote:
> > [snip]
> > if you feel that I have handled the situation properly regarding your
> > voicing, please send an email to dev-relations and I'll be happy to work
> > thi
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:05:21 +0900
Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for
> > >>voice to speak to the devs without a 'rtfm & go get a gentoo job'
> > >>smokescreen ?
>
> My intentions in this email were regarding the above worries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris White wrote:
> [snip]
> if you feel that I have handled the situation properly regarding your
> voicing, please send an email to dev-relations and I'll be happy to work
> things out.
> [snip]
just to clarify: you mean improperly, right? why wo
Chris White wrote:
> I plan to create somewhat of a consistant contact point between irc users
> that want a voice in dev.
Are you awake 24/7/365? If not, I probably misunderstood your message.
If someone goes to IRC, he (IMHO) wants to discuss stuff *right now* and
don't want to wait for you to
> >>might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
> >>speak to the devs without a 'rtfm & go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
My intentions in this email were regarding the above worries about things. I
plan to create somewhat of a consistant contact point between irc user
20 matches
Mail list logo
