Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the support for minor arches and less common profiles in CI

W dniu nie, 07.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶25 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > W dniu sob, 06.01.2018 o godzinie 12∶10 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny > napisał: > > So I'm thinking of an alternate idea: to start adding staging warnings > > for additional profile class, combined with arch restric

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the support for minor arches and less common profiles in CI

W dniu sob, 06.01.2018 o godzinie 12∶10 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > So I'm thinking of an alternate idea: to start adding staging warnings > for additional profile class, combined with arch restriction. In other > words, change CI from: > > -p stable > > to: > > -p stable,somet

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the support for minor arches and less common profiles in CI

Am Samstag, 6. Januar 2018, 12:10:53 CET schrieb Michał Górny: > Hi, everyone. > > I think most of us agree that support for minor arches in Gentoo > is suboptimal, and that we've pretty much been focusing on avoiding > the problem than really solving it. > I think it would help here to get the

[gentoo-dev] Improving the support for minor arches and less common profiles in CI

Hi, everyone. I think most of us agree that support for minor arches in Gentoo is suboptimal, and that we've pretty much been focusing on avoiding the problem than really solving it. At this moment, we have 8 arches with stable profiles: alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 x86 We have 8 arche