Re: [gentoo-dev] Improved ebuild information

2005-10-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 20:03:54 +0200 Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I guess I am one of this 'minority'. The question I just want to have | answered, is how the hell are you going to get a system up sanely (and | without tweaking /etc/portage/package.use) if besides the 350 global | U

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improved ebuild information

2005-10-05 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 21:22 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:19:39 +0200 Daniel Stiefelmaier > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | I'd like to have a functionality that prints out what the useflags of > | a ebuild are good for. Some are obvious, others are not. Example: > | The use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improved ebuild information

2005-10-01 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 02:10 +0200, Daniel Stiefelmaier wrote: > >We've discussed adding this to metadata.xml a few times in the past, > >but every time there was opposition from a vocal minority of one who > >claimed that USE flags should always do exactly the same thing for > >every package. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improved ebuild information

2005-10-01 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok really first off, I am not a gentoo developer, just to let you know :) First off, everything here is basically taken out of context from gentoo-portage-dev, so the only sane responses ( to this mail, not the other one, which was different ) are go

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improved ebuild information

2005-10-01 Thread Daniel Stiefelmaier
In my opinion, the easiest way would be a wiki. Indeed. But why do you need to modify all the ebuilds? do i have to? of course it is not necessary to modify 10k ebuilds in a week. The line could be added on the next regular update. And as said below, it could also be generated automatical

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improved ebuild information

2005-10-01 Thread Daniel Stiefelmaier
We've discussed adding this to metadata.xml a few times in the past, but every time there was opposition from a vocal minority of one who claimed that USE flags should always do exactly the same thing for every package. why do minorities rule? Actually i agree that in general use flags shoul

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improved ebuild information

2005-10-01 Thread Simon Stelling
Hi, Daniel Stiefelmaier wrote: In my opinion, the easiest way would be a wiki. Indeed. But why do you need to modify all the ebuilds? An even more simple way would be to have portage tools (eix, emerge) print an automatically generated link like http://www.gentoo-wiki.com/Ebuild:www-client/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improved ebuild information

2005-10-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:19:39 +0200 Daniel Stiefelmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I'd like to have a functionality that prints out what the useflags of | a ebuild are good for. Some are obvious, others are not. Example: | The useflag "xprint" sounds like printing support, but doesn't tell | if yo

[gentoo-dev] Improved ebuild information

2005-10-01 Thread Daniel Stiefelmaier
Hi! I just opened this in gentoo-portage-dev, but Jason Stubbs told me my ideas are either bad or belong to THIS list, so i try my luck again... I'd like to have a functionality that prints out what the useflags of a ebuild are good for. Some are obvious, others are not. Example: The useflag