> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> unfortunately this is what happens in current eselect-news.
[bunch of bash error messages deleted]
Good catch. The news-tng module of eselect-1.1* handles it more
gracefully (no bash errors), but it still displays an error message.
> This is be
Zac Medico wrote:
> Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again,
>> and I don't know if there are even worse consequences.
>
> AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs ->
> rsync script will ensure that the incorrectly name
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
>> it was brought up by ulm that the news item
>> '2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it
>> contains a dot.
>
> I stumbled upon this when I experimented with new
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> it was brought up by ulm that the news item
> '2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it
> contains a dot.
I stumbled upon this when I experimented with news to e-mail
forwarding, where there are some limitations for
Dale wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again,
>>> and I don't know if there are even worse consequences.
>> AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs ->
>> rsync script will ensure that the
Zac Medico wrote:
> Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again,
> > and I don't know if there are even worse consequences.
>
> AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs ->
> rsync script will ensure that the incorrectly nam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again,
> and I don't know if there are even worse consequences.
AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs ->
rsync script will ensure that t
Hi,
it was brought up by ulm that the news item
'2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it
contains a dot. As it was me who named and commited it, I am sorry for
this mistake. The file name in -dev review mail was called
'generation1-deprecation' and I probably shoul