Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-08-09 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > unfortunately this is what happens in current eselect-news. [bunch of bash error messages deleted] Good catch. The news-tng module of eselect-1.1* handles it more gracefully (no bash errors), but it still displays an error message. > This is be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-08-09 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Zac Medico wrote: > Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, >> and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. > > AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs -> > rsync script will ensure that the incorrectly name

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-25 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> it was brought up by ulm that the news item >> '2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it >> contains a dot. > > I stumbled upon this when I experimented with new

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > it was brought up by ulm that the news item > '2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it > contains a dot. I stumbled upon this when I experimented with news to e-mail forwarding, where there are some limitations for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Petteri Räty
Dale wrote: > Zac Medico wrote: >> Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, >>> and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. >> AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs -> >> rsync script will ensure that the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Dale
Zac Medico wrote: > Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, > > and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. > > AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs -> > rsync script will ensure that the incorrectly nam

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vlastimil Babka wrote: > The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, > and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs -> rsync script will ensure that t

[gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Hi, it was brought up by ulm that the news item '2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it contains a dot. As it was me who named and commited it, I am sorry for this mistake. The file name in -dev review mail was called 'generation1-deprecation' and I probably shoul