Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: net-im

2016-01-24 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
Hanno Böck writes: >> > [...] >> > >> > net-im/ejabberd : >> >> I have not much knowledge about erlang stuff, but I will take >> ejabberd if noone else wants. Co-maintainers are welcome. > > I would love if ejabberd gets maintained again :-) Lovely! I have added myself and you to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: net-im

2016-01-19 Thread Hanno Böck
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:19:31 + Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: > Michał Górny writes: > > Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers: > > [...] > > > > net-im/ejabberd : > > I have not much knowledge about erlang stuff, but I will take ejabberd > if noone else w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: net-im

2016-01-18 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
Michał Górny writes: > Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers: > [...] > > net-im/ejabberd : I have not much knowledge about erlang stuff, but I will take ejabberd if noone else wants. Co-maintainers are welcome. -- Amadeusz Żołnowski signature.asc Descript

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: net-im

2016-01-17 Thread Lars Wendler
Hello list, I am going to take these packages: net-libs/libotr x11-plugins/pidgin-otr Kind regards Lars On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:15:04 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: >Hello, everyone. > >The current maintainers of net-im herd so far haven't replied to >our queries (mrueg has withdrawn his project pr

[gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: net-im

2016-01-17 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. The current maintainers of net-im herd so far haven't replied to our queries (mrueg has withdrawn his project proposal). If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding it and looking for new maintainers for its packages. Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as a w