On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> The problem is that users CCed on their bug reports have provided
> patches and fixes for them and would probably get angry if we punt them
> without even applying the patches to the tree (but I don't want to
> commit them as I cannot even test
El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 13:09 -0500, Michael Sterrett escribió:
> Maybe it's time to just punt svgalib? There are only 46 ebuilds that
> use it (some, optionally).
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
> > htt
Maybe it's time to just punt svgalib? There are only 46 ebuilds that
use it (some, optionally).
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs%
> 2Fsvgalib;list_id=8127
Hello
You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs%
2Fsvgalib;list_id=812773
Most of them already contain a patch that is supposed to fix each bug
report, the problem is that svgalib doesn't build at all on amd64 and,
then, would be
