On 04/01/2010 11:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:07:26 +0200
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>> On 03/27/2010 04:51 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
>>>
>>> The only reason I don't really like this is because it breaks
>>> consistency. We have a ground rule, assign to maintainer, CC
>>> ar
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:07:26 +0200
Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/27/2010 04:51 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
> >
> > The only reason I don't really like this is because it breaks
> > consistency. We have a ground rule, assign to maintainer, CC
> > arch(es). Why make it more complicated? I have a feeli
On 03/27/2010 04:51 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
>
> The only reason I don't really like this is because it breaks
> consistency. We have a ground rule, assign to maintainer, CC arch(es).
> Why make it more complicated? I have a feeling people will continue
> CCing arches out of habit.
>
I don't thi
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:26:46PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/12/2010 09:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
> > question but there's a difference of op
On 03/12/2010 09:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
> question but there's a difference of opinion here:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5
> Let's
On 03/12/2010 08:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
> question but there's a difference of opinion here:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5
> Let's
On 03/13/2010 07:21 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 03/13/2010 07:07 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers
>> use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't
>> see why maintainers would be any more likely to act tha
On 03/13/2010 07:07 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> When a bug is marked as fixed it doesn't show up in searches developers
> use so it's a matter of who reads the email and acts upon it. I don't
> see why maintainers would be any more likely to act than an arch team
> comprised of multiple people in the
On 03/12/2010 11:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> Since all the arch team does is stabilize or keyword, the maintainer
> needs to know if other issues come up with the bug after it is closed.
>
The maintainer is the reporter or in Cc.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
On 03/12/2010 10:11 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri Räty
> wrote:
>> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
>> bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
>> question but there's a difference of opini
On Friday 12 March 2010 23:47:05 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:11:50PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri R??ty
> >
> > wrote:
> > > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> > > bug with only a single arch.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-03-2010 20:47, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:11:50PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri R??ty
>> wrote:
>>> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
>>> b
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:11:50PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri R??ty
> wrote:
> > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
> > question but there's
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri Räty
wrote:
> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
> question but there's a difference of opinion here:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272
On 03/12/2010 09:39 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/12/10 8:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
>> bug with only a single arch.
>
> Why a special case for that? The general rule seems to be that the owner
> is the maintaining he
On 03/12/2010 09:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
> question but there's a difference of opinion here:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5
> Let's
On 3/12/10 8:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> bug with only a single arch.
Why a special case for that? The general rule seems to be that the owner
is the maintaining herd (if any), otherwise the maintainer. Then all
arch teams an
There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
question but there's a difference of opinion here:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5
Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note
18 matches
Mail list logo
