Mark Loeser skrev:
Simon Strandman wrote:
I'm curious why --as-needed is disabled for glibc builds. It was first
added over a year ago in one of the early 2.3.4 builds so is it still
nessecary?
I tried removing it and had no problems building glibc and I could see
that it was used when look
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 07:56 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Simon Strandman wrote:
> | I'm curious why --as-needed is disabled for glibc builds. It was first
> | added over a year ago in one of the early 2.3.4 builds so is it still
> | nessecary?
>
> I think it had something to do with breaking b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Strandman wrote:
| I'm curious why --as-needed is disabled for glibc builds. It was first
| added over a year ago in one of the early 2.3.4 builds so is it still
| nessecary?
I think it had something to do with breaking binutils 2.15.90 or
ther
Simon Strandman wrote:
> I'm curious why --as-needed is disabled for glibc builds. It was first
> added over a year ago in one of the early 2.3.4 builds so is it still
> nessecary?
>
> I tried removing it and had no problems building glibc and I could see
> that it was used when looking at the com
I'm curious why --as-needed is disabled for glibc builds. It was first
added over a year ago in one of the early 2.3.4 builds so is it still
nessecary?
I tried removing it and had no problems building glibc and I could see
that it was used when looking at the compile output. Then I tried
boot
