Philip Webb wrote:
To this user since 2003, who plans to install Gentoo in the new machine
which I am presently designing, this sounds like a very welcome development.
I shall continue to subscribe to -dev , but not to -project.
Should I also subscribe to -dev-announce
or will its msgs be duplic
070717 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
>> I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project list
>> so how about we just get that mailing list going right now
>> and let the rest of it fall into place later.
>> My guess is that
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:28:09AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> > I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
> > list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the creation of the
> > -project ma
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 11:30 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
> Seems to me that new dev announcements should be on [perhaps the
> announcement variant] of -dev, since they are related to the development
> team. It'd be nice to hear those announcements on the list devs are
> required to subscribe to, so
Kumba wrote:
> George Prowse wrote:
>> So that would mean that welcoming new developers would be on the
>> -project list?
>
> My thinking, I think they would fit better over there, since it is somewhat
> non-technical. However, machine-generated notices of dev arrival or dev
> departure could
George Prowse wrote:
So that would mean that welcoming new developers would be on the
-project list?
My thinking, I think they would fit better over there, since it is somewhat
non-technical. However, machine-generated notices of dev arrival or dev
departure could be directed to other list
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 14:13 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
> So that would mean that welcoming new developers would be on the
> -project list?
Or on say gentoo-announce, but yes.
> Would package removals be on it because it seems to be somewhere in the
> middle?
That's an announcement, so I would
Roy Marples wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 11:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
How about defining the purpose of all these list with which we'll
soon end up before going ahead and requesting changes?
-dev is just for technical development.
-project is for non technical development of Gentoo.
Wh
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 11:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> How about defining the purpose of all these list with which we'll
> soon end up before going ahead and requesting changes?
-dev is just for technical development.
-project is for non technical development of Gentoo.
What is technical dev
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:04:55 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project
> mailing list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the
> creation of the -project mailing (the thread itself is a prime
> example on why we need -
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:54:35AM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> No, just the mailing list. Dunno but I tried to make that clear in my mail.
Oops, sorry. No opposition to _that_. ;-)
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.or
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:49:32AM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri R?ty wrote:
> > I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
> > list
> (just to avoid misunderstandings, we're not only talking about
> creating -project,
Wernfried Haas kirjoitti:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
>> list
>
> (just to avoid misunderstandings, we're not only talking about
> creating -project, but also the stuff that people with
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
> list
(just to avoid misunderstandings, we're not only talking about
creating -project, but also the stuff that people with non @gentoo.org
address get moderate
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
> list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the creation of the
> -project mailing (the thread itself is a prime example on why we need
> -project in t
Petteri Räty wrote:
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the creation of the
-project mailing (the thread itself is a prime example on why we need
-project in the first place) so how about we just get that mai
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the creation of the
-project mailing (the thread itself is a prime example on why we need
-project in the first place) so how about we just get that mailing list
going right
17 matches
Mail list logo
