On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 17:40 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > in the end
> > GCC-4.1 going stable is up to releng and arch teams (heck it doesn't
> > technically have to go stable on all arches). So who "screwed up" in
> > this case?
>
> Well, fo
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 22:55 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
>
> I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
>
> We didn't need 3000 more developers ... we just needed to give
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 12:34 +0200, Edgar Hucek wrote:
> Apeal on extended testing :
>
> Developer, please test things more carefull before you
> release it.
I hear this (pardon my "French") BULLSHIT all the time from our
developers. Look, people, I asked multiple times for assistance with
testi
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:44:32 +0100
"Stuart Herbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because the thought that stable is always "stable" or that because
> > we released things are "stable" is incorrect ;)
>
> You're not supposed to break the stable
On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because the thought that stable is always "stable" or that because we
released things are "stable" is incorrect ;)
You're not supposed to break the stable tree; that surely must include
stabilising a compiler (which is the _default_ for new inst
On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in the end
GCC-4.1 going stable is up to releng and arch teams (heck it doesn't
technically have to go stable on all arches). So who "screwed up" in
this case?
Well, for a package like PHP, the package maintainers take
responsibility for ensuri
Jeff Rollin wrote:
>
> It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how
> can it happen that there are already know bugs in the
> stable distro ?
>
> Just like to make the point that if something requires a dependency in
> ~arch (unstable), then it isn't/shouldn't be in arch (stable).
>
Beca
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 10:36 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> And no one has implemented any kind of solution.
> >
> > You need someone to implement a solution? Surely what we need is for
> > folks to actually make an anno
It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or howcan it happen that there are already know bugs in thestable distro ?Just like to make the point that if something requires a dependency in ~arch (unstable), then it isn't/shouldn't be in arch (stable).
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And no one has implemented any kind of solution.
>
> You need someone to implement a solution? Surely what we need is for
> folks to actually make an announcement in the first place?
>
> I asked for what has become GLEP
On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And no one has implemented any kind of solution.
You need someone to implement a solution? Surely what we need is for
folks to actually make an announcement in the first place?
I asked for what has become GLEP 42 because we do have a problem
r
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/2/06, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
> >
> > I don't think that tha
On 9/2/06, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
>
> I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
Is it a bad thing to
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
Is it a bad thing to be saying to your developers?
We didn't need 3000 mor
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
We didn't need 3000 more developers ... we just needed to give the
developers we have more reasonable notice.
This is the second t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edgar Hucek wrote:
> Apeal on extended testing :
>
> Developer, please test things more carefull before you
> release it.
> I already found things which does not compile out of
> the box.
> 1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
> have to u
Edgar Hucek wrote:
>
>>From my point of view, should it be garanted that a package and depencies
> compiles when all use flags are enabled. If a depency can't be compiled the
> use flag and depence should be dissabled/removed from a package.
>
>
> cu
>
> Edgar (gimli) Hucek
Give us about 3000
Am Samstag, 2. September 2006 13:18 schrieb Edgar Hucek:
> >> 2.) Enable the use flage accessibility gnome cant be
> >> merged. It fails on compile the speech-tools.
> >> It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how
> >> can it happen that there are already know bugs in the
> >> stable distr
Jakub Moc schrieb:
> Edgar Hucek wrote:
>> Apeal on extended testing :
>>
>> Developer, please test things more carefull before you
>> release it.
>> I already found things which does not compile out of
>> the box.
>> 1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
>> have to unmask linuxwacom.
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 12:34:38 +0200
Edgar Hucek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apeal on extended testing :
>
> Developer, please test things more carefull before you
> release it.
There are over 10,000 packages in the tree (11247 to be exact); each
of which can be built many ways with USE flags.
Edgar Hucek wrote:
> Apeal on extended testing :
>
> Developer, please test things more carefull before you
> release it.
> I already found things which does not compile out of
> the box.
> 1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
> have to unmask linuxwacom.
Shrug. Noone even filed a
Apeal on extended testing :
Developer, please test things more carefull before you
release it.
I already found things which does not compile out of
the box.
1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
have to unmask linuxwacom.
2.) Enable the use flage accessibility gnome cant be
merged. I
22 matches
Mail list logo
