On 10/28/2016 06:53 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>
>>> So yes, it would probably be enough to put such a simple statement
>>> somewhere. The problem is: where? ;-) GLEP seemed like a
>>> straight
On 28/10/16 16:41, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 28/10/16 08:34, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 10/27/2016 11:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:49:55 -0700
>>> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>>
On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> [snip]
>
> To be honest, after wri
On 10/27/2016 05:00 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>>> So, it is o.k. if you mention github in the Motivation section (but
>>> not five times!). However, github or pull requests should be mentioned
>>> neither in the Specification or the Rationale.
>
>
On 28/10/16 08:34, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 11:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:49:55 -0700
>> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
[snip]
To be honest, after writing it all down, I started to get the feeling
>>>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> So yes, it would probably be enough to put such a simple statement
>> somewhere. The problem is: where? ;-) GLEP seemed like a
>> straightforward solution to make it global.
>>
>
> Could it
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:34:44 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 11:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Anything put on the git workflow page automatically becomes rejected by
> > most of the developers and users for being a whim of hasufell ;-).
>
> That seems unproductive.
Welcome to Gento
On 10/27/2016 11:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:49:55 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
>> On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> To be honest, after writing it all down, I started to get the feeling
>>> it isn't necessary after all. The initial idea (a
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:49:55 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > To be honest, after writing it all down, I started to get the feeling
> > it isn't necessary after all. The initial idea (and what motivation was
> > supposed to mean) was t
On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> [snip]
>
> To be honest, after writing it all down, I started to get the feeling
> it isn't necessary after all. The initial idea (and what motivation was
> supposed to mean) was that all previous attempts failed because they
> either tried to be too s
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:42:22 -0400
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> I do think that this is one of the areas where hasufell's concept of
>> making the 3rd-party workflow the main workflow could have helped.
>> Right now the people with commit righ
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:42:22 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:07:20 -0400
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I think this reflects reality. You can submit all the patches you
> >> want via bugzilla but it isn't lik
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:07:20 -0400
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>>
>> I think this reflects reality. You can submit all the patches you
>> want via bugzilla but it isn't like we punish developers for not
>> getting around to accepting them, unles
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:07:20 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > Please review the following draft:
> >
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:TPC
> >
>
> Regarding this paragraph: "Gentoo project provides a specific set of
> off
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Please review the following draft:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:TPC
>
Regarding this paragraph: "Gentoo project provides a specific set of
official channels of contribution in which all project members are
required to p
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:00:35 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> >> So, it is o.k. if you mention github in the Motivation section (but
> >> not five times!). However, github or pull requests should be mentioned
> >> neither in the Specification or
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>> So, it is o.k. if you mention github in the Motivation section (but
>> not five times!). However, github or pull requests should be mentioned
>> neither in the Specification or the Rationale.
> Why not in the rationale? It is the most straightforw
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:55:13 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I've started writing a GLEP to formalize and confirm the current
> > practices for committing third-party contributions into Gentoo. It's
> > meant mostly to clear the rules for pull
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> I've started writing a GLEP to formalize and confirm the current
> practices for committing third-party contributions into Gentoo. It's
> meant mostly to clear the rules for pull requests. However, the rules
> are generic enough to cover other contr
Hi, everyone.
I've started writing a GLEP to formalize and confirm the current
practices for committing third-party contributions into Gentoo. It's
meant mostly to clear the rules for pull requests. However, the rules
are generic enough to cover other contribution media -- patches
attached to bugs
19 matches
Mail list logo
