On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:25:45AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> > GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit
>> > of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm
>> >
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:25:45AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit
> > of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm
> > not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit
> of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm
> not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format
> exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out
GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit
of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm
not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format
exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out looking
for some opinions or i
Mike Kelly wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:35:36 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP
27?
Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:35:36 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP
> 27?
>
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
This was my So
> My specific interest in it is for having a sane UID/GIDs that are
> identical between a set of machines, regardless of the order packages
> are emerged in.
I was initially surprised to see Gentoo didn't have written standards
for UID/GID management, but don't see many other distros having one
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
My specific interest in it is for having a sane UID/GIDs that are
identical between a set of machines, regardless of the order packages
are emerged in.
Same here. Which is why I'm hoping to revitalize GLEP 27.
--
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dev.gentoo.or
On 10-04-2008 16:35:36 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP 27?
>
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
See also:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:35:36PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP 27?
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
I'm strongly in favour of moving forw
How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP 27?
Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:46:03 -0400
Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:09:08 -0400
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You missed games-* (yes, all of them) via the games.eclass, but I'm
> > sure there's a couple more eclasses that do user/group modificat
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 00:44:57 -0400
Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:28:21 -0700
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer that the format be key=value for easier use by bash, as
> > pretty much everything else in profiles is bash.
>
> Only issue I
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:20:53 +0200
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> beside the syntax, as pointed by Donnie, it looks ok.
> I guess could be possible extract automagically from the current tree
> the data and create the datafile from it, isn't it?
Yeah, it should be. I'm writing up a few
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:09:08 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a list of all packages in the tree that currently use either
> > of those functions[2]. If you maintain one of these packages, I'd
> > especially appreciate your feedback.
>
> You missed games-* (yes, all of
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 22:58 -0400, Mike Kelly wrote:
> I have a list of all packages in the tree that currently use either of
> those functions[2]. If you maintain one of these packages, I'd
> especially appreciate your feedback.
You missed games-* (yes, all of them) via the games.eclass, but I'm
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:28:21 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Kelly wrote:
> > All the files are handled like other files in cascading profiles.
> > Each line in the file is either a shell-style comment, or of the
> > form: "key: value". The keys are: uid, shell, home, grou
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:09:11 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Kelly wrote:
> > Summarized, the format is:
> >
> > For each profile dir (e.g. profiles/base, profiles/default-linux,
> > etc), a new subdirectory, called accounts is created as necessary.
> > Inside that is a file
Mike Kelly wrote:
> All the files are handled like other files in cascading profiles. Each
> line in the file is either a shell-style comment, or of the form:
> "key: value". The keys are: uid, shell, home, groups, comment, and gid.
I'd prefer that the format be key=value for easier use by bash
Mike Kelly wrote:
Summarized, the format is:
For each profile dir (e.g. profiles/base, profiles/default-linux, etc),
a new subdirectory, called accounts is created as necessary. Inside
that is a file called defaults, containing default uid/gid ranges,
shells, etc for the given profile. Also,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
As some of you may know, I spent this past summer working on an
implementation of GLEP 27[1]. While my scripts aren't quite ready for
production use yet, I wanna get the ball rolling by asking devs who
maintain packages that use the current
Hi,
Attached is a draft of my API spec for my GLEP 27 implementation
(user/group management for package managers). Any feedback would be
appreciated. The latest version of this document can also be found in
my subversion repository[1]. Thanks!
[1] http://soc.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/glep0
On Monday 29 May 2006 23:29, Mike Kelly wrote:
> In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user
> info files to be XML
not really, it was just an idea i had at the time ... ive been over it a few
times since with the portage guys and it makes no real sense to do it in xml
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:14:01AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly:
> > I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for
> > the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my
> > proposal.
> >
> > In p
Hello Mike,
Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly:
> I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for
> the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my
> proposal.
>
> In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user
> info files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for the
summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my proposal.
In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user
info files to be XML, but I thin
26 matches
Mail list logo
