On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:51:50 -0700
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > It still doesn't make sense. Restricting any other feature
> > disallows it. Restricting interaction allows it. Find a word that's
> > the anto
Zac Medico schrieb:
> Perhaps "unattended", since interactive ebuilds must be attended...
+1, it rings a bell somewhere ;)
cheers
Paul
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> It still doesn't make sense. Restricting any other feature disallows it.
> Restricting interaction allows it. Find a word that's the antonym of
> interactive, and restrict that.
Perhaps "unattended", since interactive ebuilds
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:00:05 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for the GLEP itself; I'd like to see some patches, particularly
> for the resolver to show the restriction up front. Also a patch to
> the ebuild.5 manpage for RESTRICT=interactive prior to seeing the
> glep get approv
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> It still doesn't make sense. Restricting any other feature disallows it.
> Restricting interaction allows it. Find a word that's the antonym of
> interactive, and restrict that.
RESTRICT="automate" or similar should work, as this flags the ebuild as
interactive and so wont
Alec Warner wrote:
Title: RESTRICT=interactive
>>> I'd say it's good idea, although isn't RESTRICT=interactive a slight
>>> misnomer? You are enforcing interactiveness, not restricting it :)
>>> Although RESTRICT="non-interactive" sounds weird too, and introducing
>>> new variable would be blo
Title: RESTRICT=interactive
I'd say it's good idea, although isn't RESTRICT=interactive a slight
misnomer? You are enforcing interactiveness, not restricting it :)
Although RESTRICT="non-interactive" sounds weird too, and introducing
new variable would be bloating.
If you look at every other
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:10:33 +0200
Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Marius Mauch wrote:
> > GLEP: 44
>
> 44 or 52? Make up your mind :P
The one on glep.gentoo.org has the right number.
> > Title: RESTRICT=interactive
>
> I'd say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
> GLEP: 44
44 or 52? Make up your mind :P
> Title: RESTRICT=interactive
I'd say it's good idea, although isn't RESTRICT=interactive a slight
misnomer? You are enforcing interactiveness, not restricting it :)
Although RESTRICT="no
Just a minor proposal to add a new setting to indicate interactive
ebuilds. Until it shows up on the webnodes as GLEP 52 you can also see
it on dev.gentoo.org/~genone/docs/interactive-restrict-glep.html
Marius
--
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
In the beginning, there was no
10 matches
Mail list logo
