Petteri Räty schrieb:
solar reported that he had ebuild submissions blindly using EAPI=1 so
we hopefully made the text better reflect that it should not be used
unless absolutely needed.
Regards,
Petteri
# Eclasses will test for this variable if they need to use EAPI > 0 features.
-# Ebuilds
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:14:47 -0600
RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > non-system packages, the only thing stopping people from using
> > EAPI 1 where useful is ludditism.
>
> While most of us appreciate your desire to move forward, ad-hominem
> attacks (however subtle) really only serve to damage
> non-system packages, the only thing stopping people from using EAPI 1 where
> useful is ludditism.
While most of us appreciate your desire to move forward, ad-hominem
attacks (however subtle) really only serve to damage your point.
That said, this is the typical developer-wants-shiny-object,
On Friday 14 March 2008 03:29:26 Petteri Räty wrote:
> solar reported that he had ebuild submissions blindly using EAPI=1 so we
> hopefully made the text better reflect that it should not be used unless
> absolutely needed.
'Absolutely' is far too strong a word. A better wording would be 'unless
solar reported that he had ebuild submissions blindly using EAPI=1 so we
hopefully made the text better reflect that it should not be used unless
absolutely needed.
Regards,
Petteri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/portage $ cvs diff -r 1.44 skel.ebuild
Index: skel.ebuild
===
