Robert Buchholz schrieb:
> On Monday 30 March 2009, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
>>> So far, we've got this, by agreement of the Council:
>>>
>>> * There will be a default src_install in EAPI 3
>>> * It will have a DOCS variable, or something along those lines.
>>>
>>> I'd like
2009/3/30 Mounir Lamouri :
>
> portage don't install empty files (they are ignored) so it would be
> painless.
>
Yeah I forgot about this, I thought it just does not install empty
directories. So there will be no difference in using -e or -s if the
other package managers have the same behaviour in
On Monday 30 March 2009, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
> > So far, we've got this, by agreement of the Council:
> >
> > * There will be a default src_install in EAPI 3
> > * It will have a DOCS variable, or something along those lines.
> >
> > I'd like to suggest the following too
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:19:48 +0100
Sébastien Fabbro wrote:
> It's a bit of overtuning, but it could allow features such
> re-installing package with switching the doc flag without
> the need of re-compiling everything, and trivialize the src_install.
Anything involving partial recompiles is way b
On Monday March 30 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> It, along with the half dozen other variants floating around, are good
> starting points, but we need a final solution.
>
Yet another one: how about building/installing the documentation into
two separate functions doc_compile and doc_install?
It's a
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:07:42 +0300
Petteri Räty wrote:
> should have || die where appropriate
It's EAPI 3, so it doesn't need it.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:33:48 +0200
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Why do you want to force -j1 here?
>
> Because any package using an old automake has a non-parallel-safe
> install.
>
I would rather have detection in place for old automake in the build
system and not force -
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> So far, we've got this, by agreement of the Council:
>
> * There will be a default src_install in EAPI 3
> * It will have a DOCS variable, or something along those lines.
>
> I'd like to suggest the following too:
>
> * If DOCS is explicitly specified, it is an error if
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh schrieb am 30.03.2009 18:43:
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:33:48 +0200
>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>> else
>>> for x in AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README; do
>>> if [ -e ${x} ]; then
>> Is -e really better than -s?
>>
>
> I think
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb am 30.03.2009 18:43:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:33:48 +0200
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> else
>> for x in AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README; do
>> if [ -e ${x} ]; then
>
> Is -e really better than -s?
>
I think -s should be used here. I have
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:33:48 +0200
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Why do you want to force -j1 here?
Because any package using an old automake has a non-parallel-safe
install.
> And i had this proposal some months ago, which noone argued against
> any more
It, along with the half dozen other variants f
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
> So far, we've got this, by agreement of the Council:
>
> * There will be a default src_install in EAPI 3
> * It will have a DOCS variable, or something along those lines.
>
> I'd like to suggest the following too:
>
> * If DOCS is explicitly specified, it is an error i
So far, we've got this, by agreement of the Council:
* There will be a default src_install in EAPI 3
* It will have a DOCS variable, or something along those lines.
I'd like to suggest the following too:
* If DOCS is explicitly specified, it is an error if anything in it
doesn't exist.
* If DO
13 matches
Mail list logo
