El lun, 29-07-2013 a las 21:07 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Dustin C. Hatch
> wrote:
> > I think the point is that users may have an initramfs (that they built
> > manually or using some tool besides dracut or genkernel) that makes use of
> > cryptsetup/lvm2 bu
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:32:12PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> How the /usr in other partition ended finally then? I though that, since
> there are a lot of things in / that rely in others in /usr, people were
> supposed to either use initramfs or busybox to get /usr mounted
Unfortunately it hasn'
On 7/29/2013 20:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
I think the point is that users may have an initramfs (that they built
manually or using some tool besides dracut or genkernel) that makes use of
cryptsetup/lvm2 built statically, or perhaps they jus
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> I think the point is that users may have an initramfs (that they built
> manually or using some tool besides dracut or genkernel) that makes use of
> cryptsetup/lvm2 built statically, or perhaps they just like it that way, so
> why take awa
On 7/29/2013 19:33, Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:28 PM, yac wrote:
I have fully encrypted systems, including /, which requires an
initramfs with cryptsetup built staticaly.
Doesn't it actually require them built statically, or simply that the
necessary libraries are also in th
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:28 PM, yac wrote:
> I have fully encrypted systems, including /, which requires an
> initramfs with cryptsetup built staticaly.
Doesn't it actually require them built statically, or simply that the
necessary libraries are also in the initramfs?
I think this has already
I have fully encrypted systems, including /, which requires an
initramfs with cryptsetup built staticaly.
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:57:58 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> As discussed at:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478476
>
> Upstream is dropping static libs from udev and, then
El lun, 29-07-2013 a las 17:13 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Grepping in the tree, looks like only some old genkernel versions are
> > depending on it. Apart of that, what is requiring static libs in
> > cryptsetup and lvm2?
>
> This isn't
2. should be nuked from orbit anyway, just curious do someone know any?
2013/7/29 Rich Freeman
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Grepping in the tree, looks like only some old genkernel versions are
> > depending on it. Apart of that, what is requiring static libs in
>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Grepping in the tree, looks like only some old genkernel versions are
> depending on it. Apart of that, what is requiring static libs in
> cryptsetup and lvm2?
This isn't the specific answer you're likely looking for, but the
obvious answers w
Hello
As discussed at:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478476
Upstream is dropping static libs from udev and, then, sys-apps/udev is
currently reverting that commit downstream (even if upstream says some
problems could appear in the future as nobody is taking care of static
stuff there).
11 matches
Mail list logo
